3G iPhone Going Into Production In May 269
A few folks noted the rumor mill churning over 3G iPhones coming soon. Apparently they might be going into production as early as May, and announced somewhere in the 2nd quarter. Hopefully they manage to stick a GPS and another 16 gigs of memory in this one.
Re:why (Score:5, Informative)
Re: GPS (Score:2, Informative)
How does the Maps location based service (LBS) work?
LBS provides your approximate location using information based on your proximity to known cellular network towers and Wi-Fi networks (when on and available). The more accurate the available information, the smaller the circle identifying your position on the map. The feature is not available in all areas. Known Wi-Fi networks are predominantly in urban areas. In order to provide your location, data is collected in a form that does not personally identify you. If you do not want such data collected, do not enable the feature. Not enabling the feature will not impact the functionality of your iPhone.
I'm assuming you have cell towers near you. Sure, when driving you'll need more accurate information than the LBS provides. But on foot, a map of the surrounding area should be good enough for most.
Re:why (Score:5, Informative)
And don't think we have 100% 3G coverage over here(Denmark) - far from it. I would guess by area we're around 40%(Complete guesstimate), but coverage by population is at least 80% - I see nothing that prevents USA from doing something similar.
Re:WishList (Score:3, Informative)
Much of the benefit of a decent connection is lost with an iPhone though, since you can't use it tethered. When I'm travelling, I keep my phone in my pocket and use it via bluetooth from my laptop or Nokia 770. The horrendously crippled bluetooth stack on the iPhone doesn't support this, however.
Re:why (Score:2, Informative)
who cares? (Score:3, Informative)
The iPhone has crippled software, crippled hardware, and crippled contracts. There is no reason on earth to buy one.
Re: GPS (Score:3, Informative)
Worse, because GPS signals require so much work to read, receivers typically require several minutes to achieve a usable result from a cold start, so the option of leaving it off for the 99% of the time you're not using it is less appealing because staring at a busy cursor on your phone for 5 minutes sucks when you just want some quick directions.
That said, cell tower location approximation systems are pretty lame. I tried using one on my phone and in some areas (dense urban areas) it would do ok, mostly, but once you got out into the burbs your error bars start expanding rapidly. It's not completely useless (you can find the street name you're on and only have to look in the circle on your phone most likely), but compared to a real live GPS system it's rather unsatisfying.
Re:why (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Why does iPhone succeed? (Score:3, Informative)
Not only that, but the iPhone is free of all the crap that the networks insist on putting on your phone.
T-Mobile UK have intentionally made my Samsung Z560 more annoying to use. The most infuriating example is the web browser's bookmarks list. At the top of the list are two bookmarks for 'T-Mobile Favourites' and 't-zones'. You can't delete them, or even move them to another position on the list. The worst part is that the phone only shows three bookmarks on the screen at a time, you have to scroll to see more. So when I open my bookmarks menu, I see one of my bookmarks, and two that T-Mobile want me to see.
So basically, I'm buying an iPhone as soon as a 3G model comes out.
Re:why (Score:1, Informative)
1 New Jersey 1,138.0 439.39
2 Rhode Island 1,003.2 387.35
3 Massachusetts 809.8 312.67
4 Connecticut 702.9 271.40
5 Maryland 541.9 209.23
6 New York 401.9 155.18
7 Delaware 401.1 154.87
8 Florida 296.4 114.43
9 Ohio 277.3 107.05
10 Pennsylvania 274.0 105.80
11 Illinois 223.4 86.27
12 California 217.1 83.85
The point is that more than 44% of the population of the USA live in areas more densely populated than Spain, and more than 30% of the population live in areas that compare in population density to France. So stop using it as an excuse for not providing decent services. At the very least you should be able to provide services equivalent to France for around a 3rd of the population. In some densely populated states, the services compare poorly with Greenland (much less densely populated than any state in the USA including Alaska), Australia, Iceland or Canada, any of which would be in the bottom three by population density if they were states in the USA.
I get fed up of wah wah, population density, wah wah anytime you challenge a USAian on why the roads are rubbish, or the network coverage is so bad.
Re:3G is what Canada needs... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:why (Score:3, Informative)