Taliban Demands Downtime on Afghanistan Cellphone Networks 659
faster_manic writes "The Taliban has demanded that cellphone network providers in Afghanistan cease service between the hours of 5pm and 7am each night of the week, as they believe American troops are able to track down Taliban members using their cellphones."
Re:This made me laugh! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Stupid (Score:5, Informative)
Wrong. They can track it even when it's off. They can even use it as an eavesdropping device, when it's off. Google "roving bug"...
Take out the battery.
too bad it'll make them more easily tracked (Score:5, Informative)
they believe American troops are able to track down Taliban members using their cellphones.
Too bad it'll make all their cell phones transmit MORE, looking for said shut down towers- when a cell can't reach a tower, not only does it try to reconnect more often, but it also bumps up the transmit power.
That makes the cell phone a whole lot easier to find...and kills everyone's batteries...
It wasn't insightful yesterday when you posted it (Score:1, Informative)
And it's not insightful now.
I couldn't care less about your opinions on Islam, stop spamming the fucking board, douche.
Thanks.
Re:Isn't it as easy as (Score:2, Informative)
No. Time to get paranoid, your cell phone can be remotely tapped (speakerphone mic) even when it's off:
http://www.news.com/2100-1029-6140191.html [news.com]
That's what they're concerned about. A quote from the article:
I wonder if that applies to Steve's iPhone? heh
All cars with OnStar can be monitored the same way. Welcome to 1984.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. --Benjamin Franklin
Re:Isn't it as easy as (Score:5, Informative)
I spent a few weeks in WI this summer, and was completely blown away by their state fair. Every food booth there sold beer along with food. (I imagine it had something to do with WI being the brewery state!). In Oregon, you have to have a fenced off area, with guards manning the entrance, ID'ing everyone that wants to walk in. My cousin couldn't enter the beer garden, because her 1 year old son was with her in a stroller, and they wouldn't let her in, she might give alcohol to a minor! Nice to know that Oregon is there to Protect you from yourself!
The US Military will just put up... (Score:1, Informative)
Turning off the towers (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Isn't it as easy as (Score:3, Informative)
But if that's the will of the majority, then so be it. And if that's not the will of the majority, then get organized and change the law.
That's what I think this country really needs, eliminate the simple majority rule. If the country is really divided 50/50, then nothing should be done. We should up it to like 60/40 or 65/35 for simple laws, and at least 75/25 or 80/20 for constitutional amendments. That'll keep these silly Government Nanny laws from being passed and pissing off the average citizen.
Re:Note the word "essential" in Ben's quote (Score:3, Informative)
Also, remember that the Constitution (in the US) grants only a specific set of rights/abilities to the federal government (intra-state, and external activities), the states (within their borders, and according to their Constitution which must be similar to the it), and releases all else to the people.
BTW - that doesn't mean we shouldn't ensure people know how to use the methods of transportation.
agreed (Score:5, Informative)
The best quote from her was along the lines of 'They have paved the roads in Kanahar, which is great, but if you drive on them you'll be shaken down by the government in the day and the taliban at night.' She said that before the taliban fell that she could drive into Kandahar (when the roads were dirt), but wouldn't dream of doing it now (she was making a point, not saying that they should come back).
She is on the ground there living as a citizen and doesn't think that the taliban is going anywhere anytime soon. Her opinion of the government is that we have replaced the taliban with criminals.
Re:Isn't it as easy as (Score:3, Informative)
http://government.zdnet.com/?p=3673 [zdnet.com]
Re:Isn't it as easy as (Score:5, Informative)
Also, apart from the baths and showers with which the camps shall be furnished prisoners of war shall be provided with sufficient water and soap for their personal toilet and for washing their personal laundry; the necessary installations, facilities and time shall be granted them for that purpose.
ref: http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/geneva03.htm#art29 [yale.edu]
Re:Isn't it as easy as (Score:3, Informative)
palestine argument invalid (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Isn't it as easy as (Score:4, Informative)
Re:agreed (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Isn't it as easy as (Score:4, Informative)
A. Prisoners of war, in the sense of the present Convention, are persons belonging to one of the following categories, who have fallen into the power of the enemy:
...
(2) Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied, provided that such militias or volunteer corps, including such organized resistance movements, fulfil the following conditions: (a) that of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates; (b) that of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance; (c) that of carrying arms openly; (d) that of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.
...
(6) Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war.
...
So, while wildly off on the citation, the GP is correct that a fighter who does not obey the Geneva convention (or any other customs of war) or does not openly display recognizable symbols or weaponry does not get protected by the Geneva convention.
Re:Isn't it as easy as (Score:3, Informative)
Re:agreed (Score:2, Informative)
They certainly do, in the UAE, in Oman, in Kuwait, in Syria, in Iran, in Iraq (even before you guys invaded it).
In fact the only country where they are not allowed to drive is in Saudi Arabia.
And what do you mean by "in Saudi Arabia before the shooting stopped.." I am aware of no such incident, and I live here.