"GiFi" — Short-Range, 5-Gbps Wireless For $10/Chip 190
mickq writes "The Age reports that Melbourne scientists have built and demonstrated tiny CMOS chips, 5 mm per side, that can transmit 5 Gbps over short distances — about 10 m. The chip features a tiny 1-mm antenna, a power amp that is only a few microns wide, and power consumption of only 2 W. 'GiFi' appears set to revolutionize short-distance data transmission, and transmits in the relatively uncrowded 60GHz range. Best of all, the chip is only about a year away from public release, and will only cost around US $9.20 to produce."
A lot going around (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www.vubiq.com/news.php [vubiq.com]
http://gigaom.com/2008/02/20/60-ghz60-second-hd-movie-downloads/ [gigaom.com]
http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/RF/ogre_project/ [berkeley.edu]
Re:Bluetooth replacement? (Score:3, Interesting)
Right now there's a sort of race to come up with a bluetooth replacement. UWB, wireless USB, etc are the things this product wants to compete with.
Re:Bluetooth replacement? (Score:4, Interesting)
GiFi? (Score:3, Interesting)
WTF does "Fi" stand for in WiFi and GiFi?
Re:Bluetooth replacement? (Score:5, Interesting)
In this case you have a totally different standard that appears to be competing not so much in the PAN area but in the wireless-USB area, and in that respect I see it competing with UWB and WUSB. However, WUSB is only 480 Mbits per second...
That said, at the moment, WUSB seems to be a solution looking for a problem; which leads back to my original issue. Where is this going to come in handy at this price point? Nobody's going to pay upwards of $35 for a glorified USB cable.
Re:"GiFi"??? (Score:1, Interesting)
So what if the "fi" suffix takes on a new meaning, different from its original one? Languages change, that's what they do. The only languages that don't evolve are _extinct_ languages. Get over it.
Disclaimer: IAAL (I am a linguist)
Captcha: hubris (heh)
Re:Bluetooth replacement? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Bluetooth replacement? (Score:3, Interesting)
This isn't a wifi replacement -at all-. This is a wireless USB replacement and then some.
At 5Gbps you'd have enough throughput to put a hypothetical smartphone on your desk, and not only use your desktop monitor/keyboard/mouse for comfort, but to be able to use your desktop's processor and ram to accelerate the apps that still basically 'live' on your phone.
So imagine a setting where work data is coming off the network, personal settings and user data are coming off your phone, and desktop workstations are glorified accelerator appliances with more comfortable input interfaces that can be swapped out, time-shared, simultaneously-shared, etc. Neat, huh? Any desk would be functionally equivalent and not being at your desk would just mean less convenient peripherals and slower processing.
That level of throughput is also overkill for wireless video from a portable to a headmounted display -- or even a more mundane wireless HDMI replacement for your TV, game console, BDR, DVD, Tivo, etc. Say good bye to that tangle of wires and video switches! There's also killer peer-to-peer networking capabilities you could build onto portables. (low-power, high-speed peer-to-peer internet for social apps, gaming and data sharing? yes please!)
If, in real world use, it could only go 3m at half that throughput and couldn't penetrate through so much as rice paper, it's -still- an incredibly exciting technology that could facilitate a staggering array of apps.