Reverse Engineer Finds Kindle's Hidden Features 108
bensafrickingenius writes "CNET's Crave site has an interesting article on Amazon's Kindle eBook reader, and the extensive reverse-engineering that fans of the device have accomplished. The site specifically points out the work of Igor Skochinsky at the Reversing Everything website. His work on the Kindle's Root Shell has revealed some fascinating goodies: 'Among the ones uncovered and described on his blog are a basic photo viewer, a minesweeper game, and most interesting, location technology that uses the Kindle's CDMA networking to pinpoint its position. There also are some basic location-based services that call up a Google Maps view to show where you are and nearby gas stations and restaurants.'"
Re:Flagged. (Score:2, Insightful)
Why bother with the Crave article at all? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why bother with the Crave article at all? (Score:5, Insightful)
The worst is when you have a blog linking to a blog linking to the original info. FFS people...
The net effect is old news gets constantly recycled and real news gets diluted. How many times have you seen a new blog post about something that actually happened months ago? The "9V battery contains AAAA cells" thing stands out as the most recent example for me: here [makezine.com] (2 Jan 2008), here [edn.com] (9 Jan 2007), here [blogspot.com] (3 Jan 2007), here [lifehacker.com] (23 Dec 2006). You have a "story" at LEAST a year old that has been copied verbatim at least four times!
Original here [axecollector.com] (No date) as far as I can tell, since all of the above blogs link to it.
Plus, all of these blogs have comment sections, which make them twice as redundant because the comments themselves also fail to add anything most of the time. If they do you'll never find them because there are so many other palces that run the same "story."
Fight the watering down of information! NEVER link to a blog unless it provides something EXTRA to the news! ALWAYS take a few minutes to get as close to the original source as possible! If you run a blog yourself, work to ADD to articles you link to - personal thoughts, additional information, insightful discussion on the topic at hand - be UNIQUE. That's how you get a readership... by having something worth reading.
=Smidge=
Re:eBook readers are all wrong (Score:3, Insightful)
Now, I'll agree a simple ePaper display would be cool, but ultimately it would only be useful after others built devices around it, which coincidentally happens to be exactly what's happening now. I mean, you can go and order eInk displays from OEMs if you know who to talk to, but they're really aren't particularly useful without some sort of data bus to back them. Know what happens when you make a bluetooth display without any other functionality? You end up with the palm folio. See what happened to that.
One justification for location sensing (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Why bother with the Crave article at all? (Score:5, Insightful)
And that is still no excuse for not adding to it. You can copy an article verbatim and still improve it's value by making some addition to it, either as a personal comment, further research into the topic, or a retrospective analysis of the article itself.
The "Information Revolution" is more like an "Information Echo Box" - Plagarism is not revolutionary.
=Smidge=
Re:Flagged. (Score:3, Insightful)