Worry Over VZW, Sprint Phones' 911 Alarm 362
[TheBORG] writes "An Austin woman who dialed 911 recently discovered what she said could be a fatal flaw in some new cell phones. She called for help when she arrived at some vacant property she owns in east Austin and found her security chain gone. She grabbed her new Verizon Wireless Casio G'zOne phone, which to her horror made an audible alarm when she called 911. Fearing vandals were still on the property, she hung up and hid, then put her hand over the earpiece and dialed again to muffle the sounds. A Verizon Wireless spokesperson says it's mandatory according to Section 255 of the Telecommunications Act. The FCC says Section 255 of the Telecommunications Code requires that phones let a caller know a 911 call is underway, but does not require an audible alarm. This thread on Howardforums.com mentions that the alarm is present on new Sprint phones too."
Post-call Alarm "Emergency Mode", Boston, 112. (Score:5, Informative)
Two semi-related notes... first, a couple months ago my battery died when I was reporting a street fight. When I checked my voicemail after it was done charging I had an irate message from a cop yelling, "DO NOT HANG UP ON THE BOSTON POLICE!" and threatening me with arrest!
Second... on Nokia candy bar phones when the keypad is locked you can key in 911 and it'll automatically come out of the locked mode. Also, 112 does the same. Can anyone tell me what 112 is?
112 is the GSM international emergency number (Score:5, Informative)
Re:wrong way to eliminate accidental 911 calls (Score:5, Informative)
Easy solution (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Post-call Alarm "Emergency Mode", Boston, 112. (Score:1, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:wrong way to eliminate accidental 911 calls (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Well, duh. (Score:5, Informative)
Now the article says the FCC doesn't require a loud tone, which is technically true. Unfortunately the Telecommunications Act DOES require a loud noise of some type, so that blind people are aware that they've dialed 911.
This is a mandated "accessibility" feature. The FCC says they're free to remove the "alarm" but at best they could replace it with a loud voice announcing "you're calling 911!" which I don't think would help.
In this case Congress deserves the blame for passing a law without thinking of the consequences. They demanded that all phones make it clear to blind people that they had dialed 911, and the only way to do that on phones without a Braille interface is a loud noise of some form. No matter what the FCC says about the alarm not being "required," some form of loud noise IS required.
Re:911 Abuse (Score:2, Informative)
And now the punchline ... In the UK our number is 999, but nowadays 911 works too.
I remember the rationale given that many children would see it on TV and not know it wasn't supposed to apply to them...
Re:911 Abuse (Score:3, Informative)
It's important not to abuse the emergency numbers, but it's also just as important not to be nervous about using them when you actually need to.
Re:wrong way to eliminate accidental 911 calls (Score:1, Informative)
Re:112 is the GSM international emergency number (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Well, duh. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:WTF? (Score:2, Informative)
It isn't cheap, especially with the price tag on Glasers. But defending your life isn't cheap either, with lost income and legal costs.