How Not to Build a Cellphone 326
Jamie found an NYT story about a new t-mobile Shadow phone which starts off by talking about how Apple is changing the phone game by wrestling power from the carriers, and then discussing what could be a reasonable piece of hardware. And then how it is wrecked by software. The phone has wait screens, a task manager, odd error messages etc. Makes for an amusing read.
In the same vein (Score:5, Interesting)
Mystifying (Score:5, Interesting)
Why does everyone say this as if it doesn't exist?
I suspect it is because they want their posts to sound as though they possess some real down-home 'Murrican wisdom. Jesus. How [cnet.com] many [cnet.com] counterexamples [cnet.com] do [cnet.com] I [cnet.com] have [cnet.com] to [cnet.com] find? [cnet.com] All of these are "phones that look and act like phones."
Moreover, why is ANYONE "against" convergence? Seriously? Do you really WANT to be carrying around a camera, a phone, a PDA, and a laptop?
Wrong! That's not an advantage, that's insane. At least, I can't remember the last time I was looking at my cellphone thinking, "Damn, I wish right now I could open up a Word document!", not even if one was attached to an e-mail.
Yesterday, when I got an email from my advisor. Thankfully, I had my iPhone at the ready and it was quite capable of opening the document. I was able to answer her question immediately and it made me look like I was really on top of things. I guess that makes me "insane."
"wresting power from the carriers"? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Mystifying (Score:3, Interesting)
If the phone has wi-fi and a decent SSH client, I won't mind any PDA-ness. But I don't
ever feel the lack of a laptop, anyway, and just use the phone to be reachable
What an idiot reviewer... (Score:2, Interesting)
Where the t-mob shadow really sucks is the half azz keyboard.
Re:Mystifying (Score:3, Interesting)
Heck, I went out and got Google Maps, and an SSH client. People look at me like I'm clever when I drill down and tell them their house is the third light down, not the second. My co-workers aren't in awe any more when I reboot my web server, they are in awe when I can run a macro and suck up the latest patches. And keep them up to date on World Series score. And this is just a BlackBerry.
As soon as I begin wishing for a camera, I remember though, having all your devices in one leads to the inevitable 'all your devices are broken to you' scenario . I like being able to replace my phone, and then replace my camera, and not having to replace both.
ack.
Oh yea, and I open Word docs just fine. Even Excel and PDFs. Take THAT, Windows Mobile!
Re:Mystifying (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Comment on the keyboard lock (Score:3, Interesting)
And yes, it was incredibly dumb. And more than once I nearly dialled random 4-5 digit numbers because it had activated in my pocket. It wasn't the only model to suffer from it, though. And I shouldn't think many modern phones emulate this "feature".
How about another opinion? (Score:2, Interesting)
This is basically a blow-by-blow refutation of Pogue's article. Enjoy.
Re:Mystifying (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Mystifying (Score:2, Interesting)
Cheers. Oh, and if I'm wrong, please tell me so I may correct myself in the future.
Re:No Design Experience (Score:3, Interesting)
Personally, I find the two button press option to be a pretty good solution in the case where your only controls are buttons. The op mentions how Apple came up with a new method to solve it, but apparently fails to realize that Apple was forced to come up with something like that on account of having only a single button on the phone. Frankly, the button press and finger motion on the iPhone seems like more effort than the two button press the op is complaining about. The article's author is dead wrong about two button presses being too many however, but I agree with him on pretty much all of his other points.
TFA written by Apple Fanboy (Score:1, Interesting)
To summarize the article:
T-Mobile [tmobile.com] has great hardware on their hands. But this phone could have been so much more... if... and only if...
They had used apple's Iphone software... and since the software wasn't designed by Apple, but instead by big bad microsoft, it sucks!
Personally, I am getting sick of the argument that everything that Apple does is the work of God. While I admit, the Iphone introduced some better concepts in UI, it still has no SDK, is locked, and will be bricked by apple if you try to unlock it. It is a closed platform that is strongly controlled by the almighty Apple.
Had Apple released the Shadow with Windows Mobile, the author of this article would have found some way to justify Apples actions.
Re:Windows Mobile is the Achilles Heel (Score:3, Interesting)
This is one of the brilliant things about PalmOS: you can write a program that will run on it _without using any memory at runtime_. Because it can run programs straight off flash, without having to load them into RAM.
OK, so PalmOS has/had a lot of problems, but why are mobile operating systems still being developed that treat their flash devices as if they were just a disk...?
Re:apple may be changing the power-structure (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:No Design Experience (Score:5, Interesting)
Don't dismiss a single-key lock process because you can't think of a way to make it work.
Re:Cell phones are pieces of shit. (Score:5, Interesting)
Oh, and most modern phones (except really cheap ones) have an SD, miniSD or microSD slot.
Re:Mystifying (Score:2, Interesting)
Apple Copied LG, Which Copied Samsung (Score:3, Interesting)
Agreed, Nokia's phones are usually based on the Nokia "look" more than anything else. But there is a whole new wave of big-screen phones emerging based on trends coming out of Korea. The first one of these was a few mutant Samsungs, which begat the LG Prada, which Apple then lifted for its own phone design. Compare and contrast [reghardware.co.uk].
Re:Mystifying (Score:3, Interesting)
Of course, that's far less sensationalist and fashionable to complain about than whining that Apple delivered the future of mobile phones at a consumer price.
The Great Google gPhone Myth [roughlydrafted.com]
Pundits have seized upon rumors of a new mobile phone product from Google as their golden ticket for bashing the iPhone. The "gPhone" is the perfect foil for fear-based rumormongers because it's a secret Google han't said much about publicly. That lets the wags blow it out of proportion and stretch it into an iPhone Killer. They're wrong, here's why.
Mod GP up, Mod parent down (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Mystifying (Score:2, Interesting)
Oh, and on the "Just a cell phone" phone, I've had an LG VX3200 for more than 3 years now. It doesn't have a camera, web browser, email, games, etc. It has a phone, an alarm clock, and a calculator. That's it. It's a tri-mode phone (CDMA800/1900,AMPS) so it works anywhere. I have an extendable aftermarket antenna, and it gets reception just about anywhere. And I live in a very rural area. I'm on my third battery, so that should tell you good things about it's durability (And bad things about LG's batteries...). All in all a good phone that is just that: A good phone.
Re:Mystifying (Score:1, Interesting)