Using the Terahertz Spectrum for Wireless Communication 134
holy_calamity writes "A first step to allowing wireless data transfer over a currently unused part of the electromagnetic spectrum is reported in New Scientist. Terahertz radiation exists between radio and infrared. A new filter created at the University of Utah can filter out particular frequencies, a prerequisite for using it for data. The abstract of the paper in the journal Nature is freely available."
ridiculously expensive (Score:5, Informative)
Re:It might just take a while (Score:5, Informative)
Perhaps TFA should have mentioned that.
Wait...
Re:Hmm, (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Geek into English. (Score:5, Informative)
Sounds really interesting. I wonder if any of this applies to antenna design at average RF.
Re:Hmm, (Score:5, Informative)
Re:ridiculously expensive (Score:3, Informative)
Depends on how precise you want to be. Conducting and measuring signals in that region of the spectrum with low-loss gear can be tough. Generating and receiving them isn't, necessarily. Not many people realize that some of the very first wireless communications experiments were done in the 60 GHz range, two years before Marconi [nrao.edu].
Re:ridiculously expensive (Score:1, Informative)
Not strictly true (Score:4, Informative)
It's not strictly true that you need to have bandpass filters to transmit information. There are other ways to select individual users without frequency division multiplexing. For example:
The gotcha is that you need some way of sampling the band. One way is to to use a bandpass filter, mixer and slow sampler. Another is to directly sample (using RTDs???) or in the case of UWB just detect pulses. Bandpass filters are the conventional way of doing it, but not the only way.
Re:Not strictly true (Score:3, Informative)
Re:It might just take a while (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.alma.nrao.edu/ [nrao.edu]
Google can be your friend too.. .
Re:Optical... (Score:3, Informative)
Actually no; terahertz rays [wikipedia.org] can go through wood, sheetrock, masonry, etc. (but not metal or water).
Clueless.... (Score:2, Informative)
The concept of making filters by cutting holes in a sheet of metal has been known for ages. Using periodic (or in this case quasiperiodic) metallic patterns is called Frequency Selective Surfaces (FSS). There are numerous books and tons of publications in IEEE transactions, etc. in this area.
I did etched FSS filters for 375 GHz around 1982, and the concept was already pubslished in books by then.
Old stuff. Too many scientists, too much money, too little brain.
Re:ridiculously expensive (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Geek into English. (Score:3, Informative)
--
Get solar: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-user
Re:It might just take a while (Score:4, Informative)
Also, generating and modulating signals, with current technology, is done by firing very expensive lasers at very customized pieces of semiconductor materials. As for receivers, NixieBunny would know better then me what the current technology cost and noise figures would be.
All of which to say, this is an interesting article, but it's about 1% of the way towards communications in this band.
Don't get me wrong - this is a cool paper, looks like good work, and this might have some very interesting technological applications. But the perpetual question of "what is it good for?" that every reporter asks (it's got to be a law or something) about every scientific advance misses the point. We don't know what it's good for, but it expands our knowledge of the world, and that can only help us.
Using it for something is the job of the next genius. These guys did enough by getting it to work. Someone else will have to figure out what it's good for.
I prefer THz for scanning! (Score:2, Informative)
Publication with some terahertz images of concealed weapons on people (towards the article end):
http://stl.uml.edu/PubLib/DickinsonDSS2006.pdf [uml.edu]
lots of other THz articles if you chop back the URL to PubLib/