Sony's New Vaio PCG-TR1A: 12" Powerbook Killer? 452
Anonymous Howard writes "Sony has a hot new subnote on it's hand: the Vaio PCG-TR1A. This subnote is packed full of features: integrated camera (still and video), 10.6 inch bright wide-format screen, 900MHz Centrino, CD-RW/DVD Combo drive, 30GB drive, 802.11b, two usb ports, firewire, 3.11 pounds and a magnesium alloy case. The thing looks really cool. For me, it's the first subnote that actually gives me a viable option for purchase instead of a the Apple Powerbook 12". Read a article about it over at Designtechnica. Check out this forum thread that has good pics, other then the stock pics, next to a VPR Matrix 200A5."
Interesting... (Score:5, Interesting)
Battery Life. (Score:4, Interesting)
That's a pretty wide range...
900MHz Centrino (Score:5, Interesting)
Sony Notebook?? (Score:5, Interesting)
I am not talking about putting Linux/BSD or Solaris (what I am thinking??)
Plus their position/membership/stance on DMCA,RIAA et. all makes me want to spend my money elsewhere...
Linux support (Score:5, Interesting)
Unless you want to run Windows that is, in which case you have bigger problems.
Price, price, price (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:They're not. (Score:5, Interesting)
Untapped Market? (Score:5, Interesting)
PB 12" Killer? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Interesting... (Score:5, Interesting)
Unless you've bought into Apple's desktop systems, buying an Apple notebook means having to maintain two seperate sets of software to run on your systems.
I look at the Powerbook and shake my head because I have too much fairly good and rather expensive Windows software. If I'm going to run a second software platform (which I do) I want it to be a free software platform. I'm not interested in investing lots of money in applications for yet another properietary OS.
I guess if I had an unlimited amount of money to spend, the Powerbook would be worth considering. But then if I had an unlimited amount of money I would get an IBM PPC based laptop to run AIX and/or NetBSD on.
uhh... Don't forget about support (Score:4, Interesting)
So. Please keep this in mind before you make the leap. Dell and Apple have high support ratings for a reason. Your laptop WILL fail at some point. Make sure you pick a company that honors thier warentees. Although as of late, Dell has been getting pretty bad too.
Re:OSX On Sony? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:900MHz Centrino (Score:2, Interesting)
I know someone, had I not mentioned it, would instantly pipe in that all MhZs are not created equal (I'm a Mac nut- trust me I know), but I'm merely trying to say that there really is no niche for Transmeta anymore.
Once again from your intellectual, moral, social, and emotional superior, [ezboard.com]
You're Forgetting the Toilet Seat (Score:1, Interesting)
One of the most important questions for a subnote (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:12 inch powerbook killer? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Untapped Market? (Score:2, Interesting)
Is it really worth it? (Score:4, Interesting)
I have to wonder why so much perfectly good equipment goes to waste, while people lust after new machines, so that their CPU idle time can go from 99% to 99.5%. Especially among the ./ geeks, who probably have top end machines already.
Seriously people, if you want to play a game, get a game console. If you want some REAL fun, install Linux with just a floppy drive. :-)
Re:Interesting... (Score:1, Interesting)
I can see no reason why you would admit such a horrible thing unless you are a masochist looking to get laughed at and flamed by the slashbot hordes.
What does being a VB/C# developer have to do with anything else in your post anyways??
Re:Untapped Market? (Score:3, Interesting)
a Thinkpad running P3-900 with 256megs ram DOES NOT have to be replaced for people who basically run spreadsheet, powerpoint, browser, mail client.
A few CAD program users but they never bitched. its the sales and marketing guys (surprise) who are always claiming that NOT having a Powerbook is affecting their work.
zeke
Re:A Question (Score:3, Interesting)
I think the point of this, as it is with Apple's new iSight [apple.com] camera, isn't for point & shoot photography, but for use as a webcam.
Of course, the iSight seems to be a pretty high quality piece of glass, with a fast f/2.8 aperture, standard 50mm focal length, and capable of taking in 30 frames per second of 640x480 video. The only thing the iSight is missing, really is storage: aside from the Firewire cable, it has no capability to record anything, which makes it useless without the six foot tether to your computer.
My guess is that Sony is thinking of the same sorts of usages that Apple has in mind for iSight. I doubt the quality is as good as Apple's product, but at the same time it should hopefully be better quality than the camera they're putting on PDAs like the NX-70V that I've got. That camera is fun to use (great for getting quick snapshots at times that I wouldn't have thought to bring a real camera with me, like the supermarket or subway), but the image quality is just terrible at a very hazy & low-contrast 320x480.
Hopefully this laptop is somewhere in the middle between the iSight & the Clie. Sony's product page doesn't seem to have camera specs, but something like a 1 or 2 megapixel still camera & 30fps video camera would be good for recording images to your hard drive, while a capacity to put out possibly lower quality stills & video over the web would be pretty nice.
Oh, and don't forget -- if it can do the webcam thing (which I think is natural for a laptop mounted camera), plan on it being a subscription service to unlock whatever proprietary software & hardware Sony put on there. They're notorious for that kind of thing.
Sony support (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:12 inch powerbook killer? (Score:3, Interesting)
Apple dominates the desktop publishing market. Apple and Avid dominate the pro-video editing market (and if you think Macs are overpriced, you won't believe what Avid charges). Apple is the single largest vendor of professional audio editing machines in the music business. The only market Apple doesn't have significant market share is in the low-end desktop market, which is used for word-processing, spreadsheets, and accounting software. Apple makes high-end machines with good margins to fuel their R&D. The low end of the desktop market is a cutthroat, bloody mess! Look at Compaq, Packard Bell, AST, NEC, and many others who lost their shirts. Dell is the only company doing well in it because they don't do the R&D thing.
Not. They are too expensive and proprietary.
Hmmm....I have an old 8500 with a PowerPC 604 CPU. I can upgrade this machine to a G3 or a G4. I also have an old Pentium II machine which can be upgraded to...a faster Pentium II, but not an AMD processor, nor a Pentium III or Pentium IV, because Intel's CPU slots are PROPRIETARY . Apple embraces more open standards than Microsoft or Intel. As far as the price, I think I get my money's worth and more from the various Macs I've owned. If price is the only consideration you have when purchasing, then you should be blasting Intel, praising AMD, blasting Windows, and praising OSS.
Just because they have a few innovative products doesn't mean they are the benchmark.
Apparently they are, since this article was about Sony's new 12" Powerbook Killer. There's quite a few articles that get posted about company X's 17" Powerbook killer or company Y's all-in-one like an iMac but it's Wintel blah blah blah.
I cite the G5 as a neat system, but not innovative in the current market.
Yeah, 'cause everyone is using a 64-bit CPU that's backwards compatible with 32-bit software, 1GHz frontside bus, PCI-X expansion slots, Firewire 800, Gigabit Ethernet, High-speed Wireless, and 16GB/s of bandwidth between the CPU's and the system controller.
I do consider the iPod innovative, as well as most of their laptop's designs.
Might as well mention the iMac, since it won so many design awards for being innovative. So, let's see...that's the laptops, the iPod, the iMac, and maybe, just maybe, the G5 desktop. Which is their entire product line.
Look at processor speeds on desktop systems over the past few years. It's already a rather foggy memory the last time I looked at a Mac's specs and thought 'wow, the PC market really needs to play some catchup!'. The last one I was impressed with were the PowerPC clones, actually. They moved pretty quick compared to PC's of the same price. But that was like '94 or '95..
This is total crap. The G3 kicked the Wintel machines butts. The G4 was where the PC world finally caught up. On launch, the G4 kicked the P3's that were shipping at the time. But Motorola was unable to deliver the speed bumps to keep up, and then the P4 was out and the G4 was left behind. The G4's vector processing engine is still far superior to anything Intel has, which is why it's been used for so many Blast implementations.
In the case of laptops, I agree in this particular case, but as for other configurations forget it. For the price of a new G5 I could have a monster of a PC that would make the G5 look like last year's PC except for the pretty case that matches a cinema display. Is that worth the extra money? Nah, I'll stick with Lian Li cases for now.
Maybe you should do a little more reading. The high end G5 beats the best PC you can build right now with dual Xeon CPU's, and by the time you add all the features the G5 has, the price comes out to within a couple of hundred bucks of the G5. Plus you get OS X. Plus the G5 is much quieter than a dual-CPU PC.
Yeah, you can get a G5 with dual CPU's.. Whoopee. For that
Apple cringes in fear... (Score:3, Interesting)
Killer? We haven't seen the tip of the iceberg yet. Come 2004 I'll be posting from my 64 bit notebook. I'm sure I won't take a second look at this Sony after today.
Re:12 inch powerbook killer? (Score:3, Interesting)
Absolutely. Why not just say that it's finally some competition for the 12" PB as opposed to a PB Killer? As with all things, you make trade-offs buying one over the other.
One thing the Vaio does have going for it is that it's more complete than any other Wintel notebook of it's size. You can get a number of other subnotebooks with decent sized screens, WiFi, etc., but they require external (USB in most cases) optical drives. Doubles the weight and decreases the portability dramatically.
If I was looking for a Wintel notebook, this, in spite of being dramatically underpowered, esp. compared to the PB, I'd probably go with this Vaio. At the very least, it's the least ugly Wintel notebook out there.
BFL
Re:12 inch powerbook killer? (Score:2, Interesting)
Thats kinda harsh, I mean excuse me for not knowing that intel was 18 months from bringing out the P3 with a 100mhrfz fsb when I picked up my p2 233 back in the day. let alone the 133 mghfs bus 3 years down the line. I know that your all knowing magic hat told you what kind of upgrades where in the pipeline but not all of us can be so enlightened.
Actually apple doesn't feed any upgrades, at all! No cdr or dvdr upgrades ever. They do have easy access ram and sometimes HDD or PCI/AGP but as far as I know go they don't really handle CPU upgrades.
Demand is the reason for this, not stupid Apple R&D. They are apparently good enough for some consumers. A new Mac is kinda expensive.
First off, standards are not really equal to open source. Crap, the guy wasn't even mentioning oss in his argument, it says Microsoft, maybe you missed it because it was spelled wrong. I've been reading slashdot for a while and I guess that they changed their name to Micro$oft now. That is how everyone is writing it now...
And who the hell knows why ieee1394 has seventeen different names. Pisses me off too, but it is part of a standard so I don't really see what the point is, at least the stuff is compatible even if its a tad confusing.
Yeah, uh.. this is way out of context. He actually said something more along the lines of the powerbooks being the benchmark for laptops, benchmarks aren't necessarily innovative they just kick ass.
And this is of course totally relevant because not only are Gateway computers totally sweet today but this particular model is so freaking awesome that kids are paying outrageous amounts of money on ebay for them. I'm sure some more patient individual could scape up even more innovative pieces of hardware from apple's past that would be a total indication of the companies total domination of the entire world today.
This is just stupid, what the hell do you buy a computer for; to not run applications?? I know that my ibook was actually purchased for the reason of doing continual benchmarks and watching the result. Or maybe I just wanted to be able to browse the web, on an application written for my computer.
Who cares if the performance of an real world application is a result of optimization. It may make yo
Re:12 inch powerbook killer? (Score:2, Interesting)