Professional-Grade Audio Recording With A PDA 205
matt-fu writes "For a long time, live recording has been consigned mostly to the realm of DAT recorders, Minidisc recorders, or laptop computers. On one hand you have subpar sound quality, on the other you have a bulky rig with a big 'steal me' sign attached. Thanks to the folks at Core Sound though, mobile recording is about to take a huge leap forward with their PDAudio project. By using a hardware card that allows recording via S/PDIF onto Compact Flash, you will be able to use your iPaq or Zaurus alongside a decent A/D converter to portably get field recordings at up to 24bit/192kHz. The site includes WinCE screenshots, and there are Linux clients in the works as well."
Provessional-Grade Video Recording With A PDA (Score:4, Informative)
This is really cool, but there are good solutions (MiniDisc, etc.) already for audio recording. This may have advantages over them, but there is still a significant installed base out there which will make adoption slow.
Perhaps a video version of this could be developed, holding DV video? One of the difficulties of Mini-DV, just as DAT, is its linearity, which makes editing a chore. Combined with the LCD display on the PDA, a DV version of this tech could enable basic editing on the fly. It could do for video what MiniDisc did for audio.
Re:I Can see it now (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Provessional-Grade Video Recording With A PDA (Score:4, Informative)
This PDA solution appears to provide high-quality sampling rates/bit depth without relying on compression.
Pro-Quality Audio? Sure... (Score:5, Informative)
This has been already done, but smaller is cool (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Wrong (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, I Am An Audio Technician (IAAAT).
Nah (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Good! (Score:5, Informative)
Have you ever heard a 'board tape', as these are called? The mix is usually terrible because the show is being mixed to sound good for the paying audience, not the tape. Mixing a live concert and mixing to tape are two very different things. Real 'live-recordings' are recorded on separate consoles located away from the arena, at great added expense.
(Why are board tape mixes bad? Mixing a live show involves combining the sound coming out of the PA with the sound coming off stage (Huge guitar stacks and expensive snare drums are the worst offender in this regard.) The board tape is only getting half of what the audience heard.)
(Yes, I mix live audio for a living.)
24 bits? right... (Score:4, Informative)
The level of precision recuired to even begin to approach 24 bits recuire very high biascurrents in the device.
Actual 24 bit conversion is actually extremely hard. I am not aware of any standard device capable of this level of precision at audio frequencies, let alone 200KHz.
Also you will not find any mic or concert venue enabling you to deliver 144dB dynamic range into the adc. You will likely actually get somwhere between 30-60dB
Note: Do not confuse the wordlength with the precision. There are many AD and DA devices who output a lot more bits than they actually can deliver data for. This is done to justify the audio-biz need for specmanship. (stick a '24' bit dac in there so we can write it on the front panel, never mind the device is propably only capable on 16-18 bits)
Microphone basics. (Score:3, Informative)
Generally condenser mics (such as the Rode NT series), are higher quality and will produce superior recordings.
Re:Good! (Score:2, Informative)
Nomad Jukebox3.. (Score:3, Informative)
I tried the Sony Minidisc recorder, but was disappointed by the built-in DRM (you can't copy your own recordings to a PC digitally, because it doesn't think you have rights to them)..
Re:Pro-Quality Audio? Sure... (Score:3, Informative)