Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Space Cube – the World's Smallest Linux PC

Posted by timothy on Wed Aug 27, 2008 09:47 AM
from the not-time-cube-note dept.
Barence writes "Meet the Space Cube — the world's smallest fully functional PC. Primarily designed for use in space, it somehow manages to cram a working PC with USB ports, card readers, audio outputs and proprietary interfaces into a tiny cube chassis measuring just two inches square. It runs a basic Linux front-end, which the blogger takes a look at, and there are some great photos of the device being loomed over by everyday objects like coffee mugs and cellphones. It has connections for controlling various electronics used by ESA, NASA and JAXA, but it will also apparently be for sale to the public soon, for use by amateur engineers and robotics clubs."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Smallest? (Score:5, Informative)

    by TheRaven64 (641858) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @09:50AM (#24764445) Homepage Journal
    In terms of volume it looks bigger than a beagle board + CF card. The Beagle board is 3" square, but it can be a lot less tall than this. It also has a much faster CPU and (to me, most importantly, since it means I can actually connect it to a modern monitor) DVI output.
    • incorrect summary (Score:5, Informative)

      by yankpop (931224) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @10:02AM (#24764641)

      The second line of the article states that it is one of the smallest computers in the world, not the smallest.

      yp.

    • Re:Smallest? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by PinkyDead (862370) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @10:06AM (#24764743) Journal

      Maybe 2 years ago this might have been 'Wow!' - but with the likes of the Eee etc around - the appropriate response is 'Meh.'

      Just some quick back of a fag packet calculation on the Eee put it at 9cm^3. Obviously, a lot more than this with its 5cm^3, but you do get
      * a keyboard
      * a screen
      * 3 usb ports
      * wireless ethernet
      * mouse pad
      * power
      * loads more disk space
      * 3 times the processor
      * etc
      all for 300 quid

      Which if you got rid of would reduce the size right down to a lot less than 5cm^3.

      No disrespect to the folks that put this thing together - and yes I would like one please - but... it's not rockin' my world.

      • Re:Smallest? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Atlantis-Rising (857278) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @10:16AM (#24764913) Homepage

        Of course not. And it also doesn't help that the Space Cube, unlike the eeePC, is totally useless by itself.

        It's wonderful to have a tiny computer, but if you need to slap on a monitor, keyboard, and mouse to use it it's really not all that tiny, is it?

        It also doesn't help that the real reason, in general (i.e., other than embedded computing environments) the reason people want small computers is portability, and this thing is hardly portable- sure, it's small and light, but given that it's totally useless on its own, that lack of size and weight is mostly irrelevant.

        Even for use in space, I still think it's a waste of, well, space. Either you're going to connect it to a real computer for display and use (with that big monitor and keyboard) or you're not, and all those jacks are a waste of space.

      • by 0100010001010011 (652467) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @11:12AM (#24765825)

        Just some quick back of a fag packet calculation

        Please don't tell us what you used as a writing utensil.

    • by quenda (644621) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @10:27AM (#24765089)

      . No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

  • by SystematicPsycho (456042) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @09:50AM (#24764461)

    Would they let you pass with that in an airport?

  • Yes but... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Underfoot (1344699) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @09:52AM (#24764483)

    does it run... oh... it does? Awsome.

  • by Kazymyr (190114) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @09:53AM (#24764491) Journal

    ...measure two inches square?

  • by utnapistim (931738) <dan.barbus@gmai l . c om> on Wednesday August 27 2008, @09:53AM (#24764493) Homepage

    Too bad it's not available to the general public at the moment :(

    • by Lumpy (12016) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @10:19AM (#24764985) Homepage

      Actually this stuff IS available to the general public.

      It's called the PC-104 formfactor and it's been around for decades. Hell I got a 386 with A2D inputs and digital in and outs as well as VGA, CF interface and audio interface in the basement that is slightly larger than that that I used for wearable Computing in the early 90's.

      It's not new or special. It's standard industrial PC gear repackaged and sold with a "Ooooooh space technology" marketing twist.

  • by Brane2 (608748) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @09:57AM (#24764569)

    This thing is obviously aimed at special applications.

    For these kind of things there are much better solutions than x86 chips. They are smaller, faster, cheaper and more economic than classic HW.

    Take a look at TI's daVinci program, for example, or maybe some small Coldfire from Freescale or maybe some cool Arm from NXP etcetc.

  • PC Pro is clueless. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by fuzzyfuzzyfungus (1223518) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @10:01AM (#24764639) Journal
    Behold Picotux! [picotux.com]

    Or, less dramatically, gumstix [slashdot.org].

    The spacecube is cute, I admit, I'd be amused to have one; but the notion of it being the smallest is silly.
  • Imagine... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anita Coney (648748) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @10:12AM (#24764853)

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these puppies! You might actually be able to run a GUI.

    • Re:Another? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by meringuoid (568297) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @09:55AM (#24764539)
      'Primarily designed for use in space'.

      It is enormously expensive to launch things into orbit. Making a smaller and lighter computer saves on launch costs, and the weight allowance can be used for other things. Then again, presumably you still have to launch a mouse and keyboard and VDU for this thing, so it's not quite as great a saving as it sounds...

      • Re:Another? (Score:5, Informative)

        by slim (1652) <(ten.puntrah) (ta) (nhoj)> on Wednesday August 27 2008, @10:02AM (#24764657) Homepage

        Then again, presumably you still have to launch a mouse and keyboard and VDU for this thing, so it's not quite as great a saving as it sounds...

        Depends on its job. It could be a headless device for logging/collating/forwarding sensor data, controlling a robot, whatever.

      • Re:Another? (Score:5, Informative)

        by utnapistim (931738) <dan.barbus@gmai l . c om> on Wednesday August 27 2008, @10:05AM (#24764729) Homepage

        Not necessarily. You could (for example) have them control all kinds of things with no peripherals attached for most of the time (that is, except in the case when a problem needs to be diagnosed).

        In case of a problem if there's need for diagnostics, you can then plug some small screen+keyboard and you're set to go.

        They're running linux so they should be ideal for monitoring sensors and reporting, transmitting ping/heartbeat signals for any kinds of devices, for controlling hardware, basically for anything that can run autonomously.

    • Re:Another? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by martinve (1233522) on Wednesday August 27 2008, @10:04AM (#24764683)
      Exactly the same question. My puny phone has 64MB RAM, 369 MHz CPU, screen, battery, built-in speakers, mini-USB port and minimalistic keyboard and internal volume of 66cc (roughly 4 cubic inches). I really do not see the point of that gadget except being really cheap and expendable - and that product is not.