Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Canadian Firms Get Behind OpenMoko/FreeRunner

Posted by timothy on Sun Aug 24, 2008 03:29 PM
from the watching-the-tail-lights dept.
mario writes "Now that the OpenMoko platform has stabilized enough to provide the OM2008 image (supporting the three major toolkits), things are starting to heat up. Linuxdevices is reporting on the start of a port of Devicescape's connect application. Koolu (another Canadian company) is also doing development for its W.E. phone (a branded FreeRunner). Which leads me to ask: Where are the American companies?"
handheld cellphones communications openmoko ugly mobile cellphones story

Related Stories

[+] Openmoko's Open Source Phone Goes Mass-Market 247 comments
nerdyH writes "Openmoko has begun shipping its Linux-based, open source Neo Freerunner phone to five newly announced distributors, in Germany, France, and India, says the company. The Neo Freerunner features an open hardware design, and a Linux-based operating system that users are free to modify. The project originally hoped to produce a mass-market offering last October. The $400 Freerunner will remain available direct, online, too. A 2.5G GPRS/GSM phone like the original iPhone, it boasts a 500MHz processor, WiFi, 3D accelerometers, a 4.3-inch VGA touchscreen, Bluetooth, and built-in GPS."
[+] Technology: First North American OpenMoko/FreeRunners Arrive 180 comments
holdenkarau writes "The North American OpenMoko FreeRunners are starting to arrive. It would appear that the OpenMoko still has problems with some 3G networks, including AT&T. Although, in my own personal completely unscientific test, 2 out of 3 AT&T SIM cards worked. Check out the unboxing of a complete FreeRunner (along with debug board) and my experience getting the FreeRunner up and running. Or a direct link to the pictures for those of you bored with text. If you feel brave enough to take the plunge, you can buy your own FreeRunner from the OpenMoko store."
[+] Linux: Debian On the Openmoko Neo FreeRunner Phone 167 comments
BrianWCarver writes "It was inevitable. One can now run the entire Debian distribution (ARM port) on the Openmoko Neo Freerunner. We previously discussed the July 4th launch of this GNU/Linux-based smartphone, which is open down to its core, with the company providing CAD files and schematics for the phone. Openmoko released an update to their software stack earlier this month, called Om2008.8, which is still a work in progress. But now one can use these instructions on the Debian wiki to open up the possibility of using apt-get to access Debian's more than 20,000 applications on your phone, which, due to integration with freesmartphone.org efforts, can also actually be used as a phone. There were previous efforts to run Debian on the predecessor product to the Neo FreeRunner, the Neo 1973, but with the wider adoption of the Neo FreeRunner and the hard work of many Debian developers at the ongoing DebConf 8, carrying Debian in your pocket has just gotten a lot easier."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Loading... please wait.
  • by dattaway (3088) on Sunday August 24 2008, @03:34PM (#24728603) Homepage

    Investing their money in Washington crafting laws and developing new business models.

  • Boring (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 24 2008, @03:35PM (#24728623)
    Can we talk about the iPhone 3G instead?
  • by impaledsunset (1337701) on Sunday August 24 2008, @03:37PM (#24728641)
    OpenMoko is a very ambitious project, and, in my humble opinion, very important. But the quality of the result from the development of the software stack has been mediocre. I still have my hopes set that it will lift off, but it's still nowhere. Qtopia rocks, and it's free software, it's working, and it's cool, but the OpenMoko distributions aren't there yet, and I have the feeling that the effort is not focused. The old distro was cool, but it was abondoned. ASU is far from being usable (it is not even developer-friendly, not talking about user-friendly). FSO is still not mature. Now, this sets my hopes up. One commercial venture is interested in improving the phone. That for me means that one of the most important goals of the whole project has been achieved. Whatever the quality of the software stack is, we will have our free (as in speech) phone.
    • by gumpish (682245) on Sunday August 24 2008, @03:51PM (#24728805) Journal

      No camera.

      • by Tubal-Cain (1289912) on Sunday August 24 2008, @04:04PM (#24728927)

        I consider that a plus. If I want to take pictures of something, I'm gonna bring a good camera with me.

        • by Joe Tie. (567096) on Sunday August 24 2008, @05:06PM (#24729589)
          I'd rather have a good camera with me as well. However, 90% of the time that I want to take a picture of something it's unplanned. And there's no way I'm carrying yet another gadget around with me all the time. In those cases, low quality is better than nothing at all.
            • ... no particular desire to pay for one (be it in $, g or mL)...

              you can pay for phones with blood now?

        • by felix85 (987753) on Sunday August 24 2008, @05:19PM (#24729731)
          Yeah and the cool thing about this phone is that it can act as a USB master so if you have a digital camera you can just plug it into the phone and upload your images without a computer.

          The Neo1973's mini-USB port can be configured to act as a usb host instead of a usb device. This opens up a range of possibilities, such as USB cameras and usb input devices.

          Thats for the Neo1973 but it should also be true for the FreeRunner.

          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            Who is forcing you to use the camera? Nobody. If you don't like the camera, just don't use it. It's that simple.

              • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

                There are plenty of phones to be had that can do all three. And do camera-less versions of a phone really cost less? I found one article on a camera-less Treo 680 that makes no mention of a price cut. Of course not; they're going to keep the cost difference for themselves. So you may as well have a camera handy for when something unexpected happens -- I know I've gotten some amusing shots with my phone's camera that I would have otherwise missed.

                  • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

                    Being able to SMS doesn't add a lot to the price, having a useful camera does. ;)

                    I must respectfully disagree.

                    Creating two separate product lines is quite a bit more expensive than one; that added expense will be passed on to the customer. Other manufacturers will create a single line, and not have extra expenses and thus be more competitive.

                    So, after doing the competitive analysis, most manufacturers will decide to make phones with cameras, which some people may use.

                    Me, I never use the popcorn button on

    • by mhall119 (1035984) on Sunday August 24 2008, @07:46PM (#24730949) Homepage Journal

      The first few releases of Linux sucked too. However, just like Linux, once people start using it for their own purposes, their improvements will make their way back for others to use.

      OpenMoko right now is mediocre. OpenMoko in 5 years, after several companies sell products based on it, and dozens of hackers make those devices do new and novel things, and OpenMoko will rock.

  • by Buran (150348) on Sunday August 24 2008, @03:44PM (#24728727)

    The OpenMoko project has been around for a long time but it's been development only and unusable for the end user. US cellphone companies want to be able to sell something to end users now. They don't want an unfinished piece of junk that they don't know anything about -- they want their existing suppliers to give them USABLE phones.

    Once this thing becomes polished and usable, at least as polished and usable as cell phones get, then we might see some interest.

    • No we won't. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by StarKruzr (74642) on Sunday August 24 2008, @04:17PM (#24729069) Journal

      American carriers are not only completely uninterested in a platform that gives the end-user complete control over their phone, but actively shunning it. Their business model is to sell slick-looking, crippled devices that push as much functionality through their networks as possible such that they can charge the end-user as much as they can for things that should be free. Verizon and the V710 debacle a few years ago come directly to mind (disabling OBEX, etc.).

      I'll be shocked if we ever see a viable OpenMoko device in the next ten years.

      • by SuperKendall (25149) on Sunday August 24 2008, @06:02PM (#24730121)

        American carriers are not only completely uninterested in a platform that gives the end-user complete control over their phone, but actively shunning it

        Android answers the description you provide, and there seem to be a number of carriers embracing it.

        They are driven to do so by the iPhone but that makes little difference in that things are moving that way, and carriers realize now that it will happen sooner rather than later.

        • by StarKruzr (74642) on Monday August 25 2008, @12:39AM (#24732885) Journal

          Carriers are exerting pressure on baseband manufacturers to ensure that they do not open specifications required to get open-source software to work with advanced basebands that work with EDGE, EvDO, or HS*PA. So all you get is plain GPRS and voice, on the one baseband that was available to be used with the FreeRunner.

          Don't expect this to change anytime soon. It won't. If necessary, the carriers will exert pressure on Congress to pass a law banning open source operating systems on cellular devices in the name of "security."

  • by Sentry21 (8183) on Sunday August 24 2008, @04:10PM (#24729001) Journal

    After looking at the Koolu.com website, I'd almost rather they not be referred to as Canadian... it makes us look bad...

    So some Canadian firms think that an open-source handset is going to be worthwhile. Great, good for them. The likelihood is that even if they do get anywhere with it, the majority of their clients are going to be in the US anyway. The average person in Canada doesn't know or care about open-source handsets, and isn't going to care enough to learn.

    It's kind of like RIM - they were the first to really get mobile, business e-mail out into the world, and now they're famous. Everyone who doesn't have an iPhone has a blackberry these days, and most of RIM's clients are in the US. Where were the American companies? What does it matter?

    In this era of free trade and globalization, there's hardly any distinction between American companies and Canadian companies. I work for a Canadian company which is owned by an American company which is run by the Canadian company. We're traded on an American stock exchange, we all work in Canada, and we just bought an American company made up almost entirely of Brits and Irish. So what does that make us?

    'Canadian company' these days only refers to locality - where people show up for work at every morning. Beyond that, it doesn't make a difference.

        • She appointed all of her power over Canada to the Governor General, who makes law whatever our government tells him to.

          She exerts no power over us at all, why rebel against her? Figure out what you're talking about for fuck sakes.
  • This is mainly from the viewpoint of a graphics programmer (3d, gpu drivers, ...), so my comments will focus on that part. I know there are a lot good features on this devices.

    The Glamo chip can only use textures of 512 x 512 so it's impossible to use hw acceleration to decompress full screen video (unless you stretch the texture to the entire screen).

    The video bus bandwidth is 7m/s which gives a theoretical maximum of 12 fps without hw acceleration. That bus is also shared with the sd card reducing the bandwidth even further if you are accessing the sd card.

    SMedia refuses to give out the documentation of their gpu and only employees of OpenMoko have access to that documentation. Implementing 3D for the glamo is low priority. It's obvious it's low priority but it's a shame there's a gpu in there but you can't use it or even improve the driver.

  • by Animats (122034) on Monday August 25 2008, @12:52AM (#24732943) Homepage

    At last, a phone from Linux fanatics! You can dial from the command line. [togaware.com] Just type:

    /etc/init.d/gsmd stop
    echo 0 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/gta01-pm-gsm.0/power_on
    echo 1 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/gta01-pm-gsm.0/power_on
    cu -l /dev/ttySAC0

    AT+CFUN=1
    AT+CPIN="<pin>"
    AT+COPS
    ATD<number>

    You are now connected. See how easy it is!

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      I'm frustrated about the number of SDKs to pick up, Symbian, Windows Mobile, now iPhone SDK.. Google's Android and then this!

      It should be noted that this has been around longer than the iPhone/SDK as well as Google Android. The OpenMoko project was announced [openmoko.org] January 20th, 2007.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Who cares about the announcement date?

        GNU Hurd was announced years before Linux, and look how far that project got.

        In computing what counts is shipping / release date.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      if they could legally ban unlocked phones on their network they would do it. In fact most of their retarded phone workers think this already when I call up for a new sim to add to my plan...

      ME: I need a sim to add to my contract.
      THEM: SIM why? has your old one stopped?
      ME: NO I'm adding a new line to my contract and I need a sim.
      THEM: Then you need a phone as well, we have several to choose from....
      ME: NO, I need the sim I already have a phone.
      THEM: You haveto have an AT&T phone to work on our network.