iPhone Signal Strength Problems In the UK 202
An anonymous reader writes "British iPhone users, who bought the Apple phones when they went on sale in England on Nov. 9, are reporting persistent problems with signal strength on O2, the UK's only iPhone service provider. The complaints started only 2 days later. InfoWeek blogger Alex Wolfe says there's a debate as to whether O2 or the iPhone is at fault; it appears to be the handset, which is unusual since US users haven't reported similar problems. Some 02 customers report that getting a replacement phone fixes things; others have had to do a software restore back to version 1.1.2 of the iPhone software."
signal strength (Score:4, Informative)
Re:signal strength (Score:4, Insightful)
As long as we're going with anecdotal evidence, I switched from a Razor to an iPhone a couple weeks ago and haven't noticed any signal strength issues.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Did you have spotty reception? Thats where you're going to notice a change is sensitivity.
Re:signal strength (Score:5, Insightful)
Because he was pointing out that anecdotal evidence is worthless.
Re:signal strength (Score:5, Insightful)
If we agree that anecdotal evidences are entirely worthless, what's Amazon, Newegg, Buy.com, etc, etc. doing putting up "Customer Reviews"? What about "Resellerratings"? Or even reports by Better Business Bureau, or Consumerist, or Consumer reports? Unless it's a designed-to-be-fair poll (which almost all online polls aren't) of statistically significant numbers (I usually go with 1000, because that gives nice 3% margin of error, assuming no other sources (such as sampling bias, wrong question wording, etc.) than random sampling error), it's little better than anecdotal evidences---a couple people lying, a company astroturfing will be enough to skew the results way over to the other side.
But, such quality results are hard to come by (I daresay even in clinical studies, let alone psychology survey, such quality is hard to obtain), so if you've ever listened to anyone you don't know personally (and somehow can trust his/her expertise), you have let an anecdotal evidence influence your judgment. Does that mean you are stupid? Well, not any more than me, the president (of U.S., of Canada, prime minister of U.K., anybody important, really), or the vast majority of rational population.
In fact, anyone dismissing an anecdotal evidence just because it's an anecdotal evidence (rather than, say, it can be shown to be false experimentally, or there is some logical fallacy) is simply repeating the folly of Descartes (of overt doubt). Except of course, unlike Descartes, he has absolutely no originality and a hindsight of several centuries, which should prevent all but utter fools from falling into such mistake.
Re: (Score:2)
Anecdotally, my iPhone does not drop out in places where my other phone (Sony Ericsson T616) did with consistency. However, this is in the U.S. (850 MHz), so this isn't necessarily an indicator of how the 1800 MHz band will behave. That's what makes most of the iPhone's anecdotal evidence worthless---the fact that the majority is from a different country at a very different frequency. :-)
And on the flip side, someone with the very same model of Sony Ericsson phone reports the exact opposite elsewhere in
Re: (Score:2)
Personall, I think both are interesting, and of greater than zero worth.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, my iPhone gets much better reception than my old phone (SE P900). I can often still get a tiny bit of signal in tunnels and the link, where none existed before (and it manages to still do EDGE/GPRS, slowly, while before, I'd lose all connect
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think that should be a surprise -- every phone is a little different. iPhone is definitely on the "bad" end of the reception spectrum. Its bad enough that I debated most of the fourteen days I could return it if I actually wanted to return it. I looked long and hard at the Verizon Voyager but nothing else really compares with the iPhone.
I can pull the SIM out of the iPhone (which has no signal
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My iPhone drops calls and has tons of static in areas my old junk phone did fine in... It's a great enough phone, I'm keeping it :) but it would be very nice to have better (read: decent) reception.
Re: (Score:2)
FWIW, my sister has an iPhone and tells me that the reception is noticeably worse than her previous phone (a Razor, I think).
FWIW, I moved from an old cheap Motorola on Verizon to an iPhone, and I've noticed that the speaker is worse on the iPhone. On the upside, the mic seems to be better, so I can't hear people as well as I used to, but they can hear me better. I'm wondering if the UK users aren't interpreting that as a signal-strength problem.
Re: (Score:2)
different freqs? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
the further away from a cell tower you are, the more power is required.
Everyone in the US wants better signal strength but they don't want any more "unsightly" cell towers.
There are more cell towers per sq mile in the UK I bet. So you use less power.
last stat is totally made up...
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:different freqs? (Score:5, Informative)
One difference is that in the US, the market is largely a profit-driven free-for-all, where the actors can choose to only put towers where it will be profitable to do so. That means the big cities, their suburbs, and the highways between them. In most of Europe, there's coverage requirements to get a license to operate (and consumers that historically have bought things based also on quality and not features-for-the-price alone).
Another difference is that in Europe there's not a near 100% lock-in for phones to a certain provider, like in the US. Most people in the US aren't even aware that phones don't have to be locked to a provider. Some have heard of unlocking of phone, but even of those, almost none know that you can get phones that weren't unlocked, but never locked in the first place.
In Europe, if a provider hasn't given a good enough service or coverage, you have historically been able to take your phone elsewhere and get a new plan for your existing phone. The lock-in of the iPhone to a single provider is going to be a lesson in how good the "old" system was, and make European users understand the terrible situation US users have, and why so few Americans have cell phones.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It certainly never was a feature in the software world. That was just "luck".
110 million out of 300 million is not "so few" (Score:2)
More than 1/3 is not "so few". [networkworld.com]
(Here's how I figured out the 1/3 bit from "110 million".) [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
However, in market penetration term, it is pathetic compared to europe. A lot of European countries have above or close to 100% market penetration ( i.e. more than 1 mobile per inhabitant )
See the numbers here: http://www.cellular-news.com/story/21065.php [cellular-news.com]
That said, even with a shitty market penetration, the US is one the biggest market for mobile phone in the world with China ( 4
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
That's a "truth with modifications". If you subtract the areas in the US where there's no GSM coverage, i.e. most of the country, you get a GSM population density that's higher.
Wow wow, that sounds nuts to me? Where did you get the idea that in "most of the country" there's no GSM coverage? I'd love to see the statistics about that.. I don't suppose you have any? Here's the coverage map for ATT btw http://www.wireless.att.com/coverageviewer/ [att.com]. I guess it's possible that including Alaska covered vs uncovered could be CLOSE ... but I'm not sure. If you count any cell coverage, (CDMA, smaller companies, etc) you're dead wrong.
One difference is that in the US, the market is largely a profit-driven free-for-all, where the actors can choose to only put towers where it will be profitable to do so. That means the big cities, their suburbs, and the highways between them. In most of Europe, there's coverage requirements to get a license to operate (and consumers that historically have bought things based also on quality and not features-for-the-price alone).
I'm suddenly forced to realize I've been blinded by the
Re: (Score:2)
The CIA factbook says the USA has 233M subscribers (2006), 301M people = 77%
The EU has 466M (2005), 490M people = 95%
(OK, your link is newer. But look at the subscriber ratios in the boxes on the map for the UK, Germany, Sweden etc -- above 100%! My 85 year old grandparents do have mobile phones
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For a more honest map of AT&T's GSM coverage, see:
http://www.gsmworld.com/cgi-bin/ni_map.pl?cc=us&net=b3 [gsmworld.com]
There too, the coloured pixels are deceiving and gives an impression of much higher co
Re: (Score:2)
If counting all GSM providers, coverage is much better, but still not even close to half the area, and nowhere near the coverage situation in Europe.
Still waiting on numbers. Gifs can only tell us so much :) Besides which, the base statement about GSM is not applicable to the cell situation in the US since Verizon/Sprint have huge networks (disputably bigger than ATT).. Anyway, if you have any facts about this, I would love to see them. I haven't been able to find any.
And to those who say that the population density is higher in Europe, that's only true for some European country. The Nordic countries, for example, has a much lower population density than the US, but still around 95% geographical coverage, and a similar number of teens and adults using at least one cell phone.
Wow, you're right, America SUCKS. I don't think anyone has brought up population density, other than you? Don't quite know what your bone is... Sweden/Norway have MARGINALLY lower popula
Re: (Score:2)
The OP was refering to GSM exclusively. Whether this is important for a regular user or is "cell coverage of any type" is different. OTOH don't be confused by the colors of the map of ATT you provide. Zoom in one step and you will see a better picture of poor and no coverage areas.
Your theory is no more authoritative than my posting the link the graphic! I'm still waiting for numbers, which nobody has provided yet. I haven't been able to find any myself...so it's still open.
I also think you're misinterpreting the second link.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think this is accurate. Most of the US has GSM coverage - you can check the AT&T coverage map [att.com]...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The UK is much smaller, but quite hilly...
Cellphone coverage in the netherlands is very good because the country is small, densely populated and flat.
Re: (Score:2)
Which network offers you the best quality of signal depends on where you are in each city, and what materials the building you are in is constructed from.
Mobile handsets can adjust the strength of signal they need to transmit, in order for the tower to receive a reliable signal. That might explain the difference in battery lifetime. Perhaps the cell towers are more spread apart. This would depend on population density.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:different freqs? (Score:5, Informative)
It is probably caused by some combination of these two things:
1. Transmit power for 1800/1900 (probably what is in use in NZ) is half the wattage allowed for the 850 band in the U.S. The 850 MHz allows for significantly greater tower spacing at a cost in cell phone life. You can't get away with that in the 1900 MHz band because the signal doesn't carry as well. AT&T uses 850 heavily, for obvious reasons, though in California, you will likely find many 850 MHz towers at much closer spacing and at reduced power to minimize the cell's overall coverage footprint to reduce the collisions inherent in high density environments with limited spectrum. You shouldn't see your cell shouting at anywhere near maximum output, though, so I sort of doubt this has that much to do with the difference, though I suppose it might be a factor.
2. GSM phones can use different encodings depending on signal strength, available bandwidth, the preference of the tower, and the intersection of modes supported by both your phone and the tower. It is much more likely that the phone is operating in one of the lower power modes in NZ. Half rate codec draws significantly less power than the other codecs, and EFR draws slightly more. IIRC, in California, AT&T's towers prefer FR if the phone supports it, because the call quality sounds better and they have enough tower density to handle it. In NZ, they may be using HR, which by itself can make a huge difference in talk time because the cell phone is essentially "talking" to the tower during only half as many time slots.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, it would be 900MHz first. However, 1800MHz fill spectrum is probably utilitized in NZ a lot. In Australia theres plenty of 1800MHz on top of 900MHz due to capacity issues that hit operators a decade ago. AT&T would be using 1900MHz fill in I guess - they've got 5MHz UMTS chewing into that band, but they've had a lot more time to plan out a network. (Pardon my ignorance, I have no idea about US mobile spectrum allocations)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
iPhone/AT&T just outside of Nashua, NH, for what it's worth. The situation was the same on Verizon where I last lived (Williston, VT - where, for the record, the iPhone works perfectly).
No problems here... (Score:5, Informative)
I'm not exactly in a major metropolitan area either, out here in a commuter town in the South West, but my signal strength hasn't really been a problem - I'm always able to make calls or connect via GPRS or EDGE, so I'm pretty much happy at the moment. I've travelled a bit as well in the past 2 weeks and I've yet to experience signal loss, even out in the country side.
Re: (Score:2)
The "connect via GPRS or EDGE" is a problem for me. I'm not bothered very much that it doesn't have 3G (I've installed ziproxy + privoxy which cut down traffic), but not even having EDGE sucks (slow gets even slower!? and YouTube won't even try opening movies).
That says more about Sony Ericsson (Score:2)
Could we do away with iPhone this and Apple that? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Could we do away with iPhone this and Apple tha (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
One small detail (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Problem with "smartphones" (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is this really a frontpage story? (Score:5, Funny)
You would need at least 03 customers before this should make a headline.
England != UK (Score:5, Informative)
It's not a bug, it's a feature! (Score:2, Funny)
What are you discussing now is actually the designer feature thoughtfully provided by Steve Jobbs himself.
Imagine, just imagine - you're listening to the iTunes music on your iPhone. Do you want to be distracted in such a wonderful moment? No!
*Especially* not by a phone call!
iphone is meh from a UK perspective. (Score:4, Interesting)
The iphone, while being exceptionally heavily marketed, has already been deemed uncool in the 18-30 age group. Seems to be mainly older people who buy it, more susceptible to the advertising that it's "hip".
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
My little sister (18) exact words on the matter were "why would anyone buy an iPhone cause its rubbish and you get all the stuff it does in an iPod anyway" my other little sister (16) hated it because it lacked a keyboard and was really expensive.
Then we have my ex work mates (all aged between 16-20) universally
Re: (Score:2)
However, I bought one, and I love it. It's definitely better than the N95 which I also owned and used for a couple of months. The N95 is a buggy P.O.S. in my opinion. I don't know why people like it.
Texting is fast on the iPhone, but it's not really geared for one handed texting like more conventional phones.
Browsing and email is awesome. I run my life by email and this phone smacks the N95 in
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Oh REALLY now? I wish you'd come tell the 18-30 age group to quit asking to mess with my iPhone then. I *guess* I'm older, at 37??? but I didn't buy the phone for hype or advertising. I bought the phone because it is the best phone I tried. The phone features are the best, from voice mail to the address book, of any phone I've tried. All the other stuff (email, maps, a really good web browser
Re: (Score:2)
This is nearly impossible for me to believe. The interface has been the bane of WinMo devices right from the start! You can complain about iPhone's lacking features and have credibility about it, but to say it's less user friendly than Windows Mobile is downright ludicrous. Give an
Related to unlocking? (Score:3, Interesting)
Isn't it possible that if UK users are applying patches/firmwares intended for US iPhones (since that's where it would appear the jailbreaks/unlocks originate) then there may well be a difference in GSM configurations?
Also how many of these users bought their phones from the US? Does anyone know for certain whether or not there are NO hardware/software differences between US and UK iPhones?
Is that the UK is more 3g then EDGE and the iphone (Score:2)
Different Handsets. (Score:2, Insightful)
> it appears to be the handset, which is unusual since US users haven't reported similar problems. Some 02 customers report that
> getting a replacement phone fixes things; others have had to do a software restore back to version 1.1.2 of the iPhone software."
It is not strange. I personally assume that the UK phones use GSM and the US phones do not, so they transmit over two completely different schemes. It is sad that this point was missed by the author of the article. Althoug I am not an expert, i re
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The next iPhone (which will probably be released 1Q 2008) will likely be 3G, which is to say GSM with UMTS or HSDPA for data transfer. And again, will support enough frequencies to allow them to have one phone sold around the world. This reduces cost by having a unified, simpl
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Downgrading to 1.1.2 doesn't solve anything (Score:4, Informative)
Downgrading the main 1.1.2 firmware only changes the software - so you can reenable the
There's details in this thread:
http://www.hackint0sh.org/forum/showthread.php?t=16571 [hackint0sh.org]
In a nutshell, anyone downgrading their software to 1.1.2 or 1.1.1 or lower and who says they experiencing better cell phone reception is working under the placebo effect, because the firmware they are downgrading doesn't affect the radio at all. And no one knows how to downgrade the baseband firmware - or if they do, the technique isn't being publicized.
As far as reception, on T-Mobile in the US, my reception has generally been good. There's a bit of a funky "bug" that I've seen that if the reception is low or "no service" and you move into an area with service, it takes the phone a while to recognize this. So if you are in an underground tunnel and have no reception, then when you leave the tunnel it can take minutes for the iPhone to notice it has service again. This may be a "feature" since they are trying to save power or something, but it can be annoying to wait 3 minutes or more for the iPhone to decide it has service. There's also a rare odd effect that the phone will think it has all 5 bars, but will, in fact, have no service at all. Any time I have either of these issues, they correct themselves with time - or I can just power down the phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it depends on how they are judging their signal strength. If they are going off of what their phone tells them rather than actual performance when u
It's the antenna, not the software (Score:5, Informative)
iPhone disassembled:
http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/iPhone/Communications-Board/105/8/Page-7/Communications-Board [ifixit.com]
One can see a small little cable going from the RF Module to the antenna. In almost 99% of the GSM phones on the market today, the antenna is right next to the RF Module. This is to minimize the RF losses between the RFIC and the antenna. By using a cable, significant losses are introduced into the system by both the cable and the miss-match at both ends of the cable. The antenna is also at the bottom of the phone and is more likely to be covered by the user's hand (further decreasing sensitivity); though there are quite a few phone on the market with antennas at the bottom--it is how they get around the SAR limits which are specified as the peak radiation a user receives next to their ear (the mouth area is not measured in the FCC/EU tests.
So, while from an anecdotal perspective, it appears the iPhone has random sensitivity issues; from an antenna engineer's perspective however, it is no surprise why the iPhone has lower performance than most phones (but would still have similar performance to other phones with poor antenna designs--of which there are several for different reasons than cable losses).
If you are interested in reading more technical reports about antenna performance in mobile phones, go to the following website:
http://antennas.astri.org/antennas_mirror [astri.org]
PDF Password = astriantennas
It's because Jobs is too far away (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
This was like saying "Chevies from Michigan suck. Canadians are complaining about the North American automaker's reliability."
Re:Clarification of the summary (Score:5, Funny)
"=" is an assignment; "==" is pronounced "is equal to". Say it! Say it and mean it!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"=" is an assignment; "==" is pronounced "is equal to"
Rich.
Re: (Score:2)
Just to clarify the parent posting ...
You use = for binding and equality. This is like 99% of uses in well-written functional code.
I've been a professional OCaml programmer for > 3 years and I don't recall ever having used == (pointer equality). You might use it in certain lowlevel code.
Re: (Score:2)
Do be do be do...
1st rule of the internet: If you're going to call someone out for using a primitive language, make sure you're up to scratch with your own
Re: (Score:2)
And of course computer programs are primitive. 1+1=10 to computers. They have to go through abstractions in order to distinguish beyond "on" and "off." It's not an insult to call them primitive, it's just the way machines are, even though they are far more advanced than they were in the past, etc etc. I can look at context, experience doubt when my "code" is producing unusual r
Re: (Score:2)
OK I'll buy the England != UK bit, but Britain, ie "Great Britain" includes Scotland and Wales. That's why it's "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland".
Re: (Score:2)
you know, I was on an air france flight last week flying back to paris, when a petite donnybrook broke out between a yank and a frog.
It was priceless: all the yank could do was look angry and confused and repeat: what's your problem?! ad nauseum, as he was promptly and lucidly dressed down verbably by the french gentleman, much to the amusement of the passengers.
OT? Absol
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
What's really wrong (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I abandoned O2 for Vodafone because the O2 coverage was terrible where I live (a suburb of London); no signal at ground level, I was able to get a weak signal by the window in one bedroom. Coverage isn't so great.
But aren't we on a different frequency here in ths UK? It would be quite easy for the UK experience not to be the same as the US experience.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Sounds like (Score:5, Informative)
The issue isn't the operator.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
If Jobs had not made so many proclamations about the ability of the iPhone to walk in water, then maybe people wouldn't be picking on the reception issues, which all new products might seem to suffer as they enter new markets.
QFT. To be fair, the Apple fanboys were also proclaiming this even louder than Jobs. I was so glad when the iPhone launched, because we could stop hearing about how it was going to revolutionize the whole phone landscape. This story is only newsworthy because of how much ridiculous amounts of hype the damn phone got.
Re: (Score:2)
Feh!
Re: (Score:2)
What else than flamebait would you call your post? Let's see:
"If Jobs had not made so many proclamations about the ability of the iPhone to walk in water"
Show me one single claim Jobs made about the iPhone's abilities that is false.
Re: (Score:2)
The O2 home page says it all:
http://www.o2.co.uk/ [o2.co.uk]
It no longer features an iPhone on half a page. There is a Sony there instead. Nuff said.
The Jobs in your Mind (Score:2)
Also, walking in water does not seem too hard to me to begin with.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That could be true for some networks, but not the GSM/UMTS network I use. I set my phone to use only 3G service; consequently, all voice calls go over the UMTS network. Even without forcing the phone to use 3G, the majority of my calls went over 3G. By default, UMTS/HSDPA service is preferred and GSM/EDGE is used when UMTS is unavailable.
And this is going to be the case on an
Re: (Score:2, Informative)