Slashdot Log In
Running Google Android On iPhone Clones
Posted by
timothy
on Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:36 PM
from the market-penetration dept.
from the market-penetration dept.
wooby writes "With the release of Android's source code, we may see iPhone and Nokia clone phones of Chinese origin capable of running Google Android. These phones, often available for less than $200 without a contract, are available on DealExtreme and elsewhere. But the software running on them is universally awful. Is the clone phone market a vast, nascent install-base for Android, and part of Google's end game? According to Google's Dave Bort, 'One of our goals would be, just to get Android all over the place' [YouTube link]."
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
welcome (Score:5, Funny)
Re:welcome (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:welcome (Score:5, Insightful)
It's like the 80's except better since the software is open-source and you aren't locked into the whims of the supplier!
Everybody wins! Yay!!!
Parent
Re:welcome (Score:4, Funny)
It's like the 80's except better since the software is open-source and you aren't locked into the whims of the supplier!
And also that Tiffany isn't at #1.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't know if this will work out as well as some people are predicting. People don't want phones with Android because Android itself is so great. People are excited about Android because it promises to be an open PLATFORM on top of which people can build cool APPS. It's the APPS that everyone wants--like all the cool things we're seeing on the iPhone, but without all the dumb restrictions of Apple and the App Store and the limitations of the iPhone hardware (removable storage, etc.)
But with all these clon
Re: (Score:2)
Re:welcome (Score:4, Funny)
But it's not evil! That means it should feel good.
Parent
Sure. Why not? (Score:3, Insightful)
It worked for MS-DOS. Just ask Microsoft. ;)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
why wouldn't the Chinese knockoff manufacturers just sell their phones with Android installed on them in the first place? they have no real attachment to a shittier OS (unlike carrier-rebranded phones), and they'd save on both development costs and also move more product.
so it'll likely only be people using AT&T/Cingular-branded phones, or perhaps even the iPhone, who actually have to install Android on their own.
And that's not all all over the place (Score:2, Informative)
Google would like to get your personal information all over the place.
i wish i could run android on my real iphone (Score:3, Insightful)
because i really hate the iphone os.
uhh (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Re:uhh (Score:5, Interesting)
Well, I bought one because it was(arguably still is) the best smart phone on the market.
But that doesn't mean I like Apple and the iPhone OS. It's stupid silly how they have it locked down and I'm tired of the iTunes tie in.
I'll be trading my iPhone out for a G1 soon probably, but I don't at all regret having bought the iPhone back in January. It was the best device around at the time and it's served me well over the last year.
Actually I don't really like the G1 all that much either. I think the hardware isn't as nice as the iPhone hardware. I'm really hoping for an iPhone ripoff with the Android software on it.
But like the iPhone was over the last year, the G1 is probably the best device for me at the current time. So I'll buy one and when something better comes out, I'll move to that.
Parent
Re:uhh (Score:5, Interesting)
Considering Motorola has already stated they are going to make a series of devices with Android, and I'm certain that other equipment makers will probably jump on board at least with a handful of devices, I don't think you will have to wait too long for a more elegant android device.
That being said, I think the criticisms on the hardware of the G1 are necessarily fair. I mean, yeah, it doesn't shine, but I like function over form personally and the hardware buttons and the qwerty keyboard suit me more than just having the touch screen.
I respect that that's not good enough for some, but I don't think the G1 was developed as an iPhone killer like some believe and like the gadget media keeps trying to indicate. I think it's aimed more at the audience of people who want a smartphone but want a more open platform than what they are being served by most providers. For instance, I'm a programmer myself and the idea that I can sit down and easily develop applications for my own use for the G1 really drew me towards the Android platform in general. Yeah, you can do that on the iPhone, but not nearly as easily or conveniently as you can on the G1. Not to mention that the SDK was available even before the first device was out and google has already laid out a roadmap for improvements to the platform and SDK. A far cry from what you get from Apple. It's as if Steve Jobs begrudgingly allowed the SDK to be more widely available but really didn't want that to happen.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
"But that doesn't mean I like Apple and the iPhone OS. "
agai, why did you buy it? what driving factor was involved in needing to get a smart phone that isn't what you wanted?
I mean you paifd a lot of money and get locked into a horrible rate plane ..why?
I'm guessing it's to be 'cool' like the other kids. Of course, that just leads to you whining about it to sh[w how 'cool' you are.
I suppose it could ahve been a gift.
Re:uhh (Score:4, Insightful)
Is McDonalds the best food on the market?
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
There are thousands and thousands of apps in the app store. You make it sound like there are none at all. It is very easy to write something and have it published, so I'm not quite sure what you're talking about.
Re:uhh (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Nothing in Apple's history should've given anyone any indication that any decent amount of tinkering would be allowed by Apple.
Even Apple's publication of the complete schematics and BIOS source code of some of its 8-bit home computers?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
How about just better software? (Score:3, Interesting)
the CECT P168C has a feature I cant fin in any other phone. Dual SIM cars support. I could have my work phone sim and my personal phone sim in one phone and reduce pocket clutter. I wold KILL for this feature but the morosn that make most american phones refuse to deliver this feature.
Hell the few Nokia's that did support it were Europe/asia only.
Re: (Score:2)
That's an unfortunate place to make a typo....Dual-SIM phones would be nice, though.
Re:How about just better software? (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Indeed. There's no need for dual SIMs, which is why the feature vanished from European phones -- you just put multiple lines on one SIM and let the phone handle it. It's quite commonplace in Finland among my former colleagues. A lot of people at work in the US want to do this, but none of the carriers we've talked to, as a large university, are interested in offering this functionality.
Shameless plug? (Score:5, Interesting)
1) Submit "story" to Slashdot with affiliate sales link cleverly embedded inside.
2) Profit!
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Sounds good, especially for prepaid plans (Score:3, Interesting)
When my contract expires (early next year), I'll be in the market for a new phone and plan. This time around, the prepaid plans I've been seeing might actually be a better deal than what I've been paying.
The trouble is, prepaid phones seem pretty crappy on average. I have a Motorola Razr which I'd likely keep, but sadly it's CDMA (Verizon) so I can't stick a prepaid SIM into it. At the same time, I wouldn't mind ditching my separate mp3 player and having a phone capable of using the wifi I have available in many places. That all points to "smartphones", which can be really expensive without a 2 year plan.
Buying an unlocked phone with a decent OS for $200 and buying some cheap flash might be a good solution. Or, if the hardware sucks and the OS is poorly adapted to it, it might be a frustrating experience. Time will tell, but I'm not anxious to become an early adopter here.
Re: (Score:2)
Also available under Windows Mobile (Score:4, Informative)
Consumer Electronics (Score:5, Insightful)
Linux thrived in a hobbist environment eventually to the point of corprate adoption, which takes both time, a community, and a willingness to run at a loss for a long time. The real key to success is developers whose goal was a OS that was secure, stable and efficent on legacy hardware, and somewhat "peer reviewed". For Android, the average developer is going to produce $3-$5 applets on their own for consumers who have no sense of style or consistency (UI standard). I cringe; personally when I see applications for my iPhone that have no forethought and look like bastard stepchildren compared to my other apps who follow the UI standards. For a consumer good, it needs to be "excellent" (or "better" than the competition) and not only that, downright "sexy" before it hits the masses or it is going be DOA or lackluster at best.
I fear the same methodology that made Linux "proper" great, will make Andriod a cheap OS for cheap phones developed on by bad developers for companies trying to squeeze every last cent of profit out of a "consumer good" like a toaster or DVR. That being said, I hope I am wrong.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I cringe; personally when I see applications...
SYNTAX ERROR
I love pointing out the errors of people who say things like this: "for consumers who have no sense of style or consistency".
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think Google is unfortunately in a precarious position with Android if it's primary niche becomes crapware-filled knockoff phones or installed on very uninspired and underpowered hardware. They are in the same boat as MS, where a large majority of criticism of the platform from the average consumer is due to OEM modification, pre-loading, and crappy hardware support (via 3rd party drivers).
Linux thrived in a hobbist environment eventually to the point of corprate adoption, which takes both time, a community, and a willingness to run at a loss for a long time. The real key to success is developers whose goal was a OS that was secure, stable and efficent on legacy hardware, and somewhat "peer reviewed". For Android, the average developer is going to produce $3-$5 applets on their own for consumers who have no sense of style or consistency (UI standard). I cringe; personally when I see applications for my iPhone that have no forethought and look like bastard stepchildren compared to my other apps who follow the UI standards. For a consumer good, it needs to be "excellent" (or "better" than the competition) and not only that, downright "sexy" before it hits the masses or it is going be DOA or lackluster at best.
I fear the same methodology that made Linux "proper" great, will make Andriod a cheap OS for cheap phones developed on by bad developers for companies trying to squeeze every last cent of profit out of a "consumer good" like a toaster or DVR. That being said, I hope I am wrong.
I really really really really really really REALLY hope that entire comment was meant to be sarcastic.
Firstly, Windows is good because of OEMs. Microsoft have to do very little hardware support, because they know that the hardware makers will do it for them (or risk losing money by having a product which doesn't work on 90%+ of machines). Get a machine with Windows and it will work (for a certain value of work, since we are talking about Windows).
Linux is generally bad because of lack of OEMs installing it.
history repeats itself cuz we weren't listening (Score:3, Interesting)
But the software running on them is universally awful. Is the clone phone market a vast, nascent install-base for Android, and part of Google's end game?
What, a parallel to the PC/PC-compatible watershed? God, I hope so. The next step is getting them to change the billing rates for wireless, they're killing us.
This could just cut out the big phone brands. (Score:5, Insightful)
Basically, you're saying that with Android, a manufacturer wouldn't really even need the support of a big brand of cellphones - since the big brands use China for fabrication, but then pocket some of the money.
So Chinese fabs could just hire a couple of engineers to quickly make clones of devices designed by experts, and there would be a ready-made, free software for those devices. I like it! But it must be a scary thought for companies like Nokia, Motorola, RIM and Apple. Maybe it will drive some hesitation about the use of Android, because everyone will know that knockoffs will work pretty much identically to an Android phone.
Potentially, the big winners here could be the carriers, who could just brand the cheaper hardware.
What's with the embedded affiliate link? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:What's with the embedded affiliate link? (Score:4, Interesting)
So what? The guy is pointing you towards something you're interested in. What does it matter if he makes a little scratch from it?
Now if it were a Slashdot editor's affiliate link, that would be a different story.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, considering none of the knock-off phones listed actually HAVE Android installed, hopefully he won't see many purchases. Still, shame for using an affiliate link and not even pointing to the products you're talking about.
Re:What's with the embedded affiliate link? (Score:5, Insightful)
This is an 'everybody wins' situation. You get a story, slashdot gets content, DealExtreme gets traffic, and the author of the story gets a small kickback for bringing that traffic. Is that such a bad thing?
Parent
History repeating itself... (Score:3, Interesting)
If history is any indication, the open standard will win... these "clones" are an indication of that. Their initial quality will be awful, but if there's a market, quality will improve.
Of course, there are differences and nothing is guaranteed, but the similarities are too striking to ignore.
keyboard? (Score:4, Informative)
They're cheap for a reason (Score:4, Informative)
Most of these phones have a 30 - 60Mhz ARM core with 4-8megs of RAM. No Nucleus based phone is going to run Android anytime soon. The ones that run Windows Mobile might, but they're far from what I'd call cheap.
The History Books Will Mark This Day (Score:2)
Forcing the Airwaves Open (Score:4, Interesting)
I hope that Google's "end game" (really just a beginning, natch) is to force open access to wireless carrier networks. "Roaming" charges and other lockins that bundle the physical network with the data, its servers, and (in the US) even the client HW are entirely against the openness of networks that has made them extremely valuable for everyone. Until networks were opened and unbundled, they were not so much engines for growth as they were accessories. Telcos and other network operators long ago stopped innovating in any area other than lobbying, lawsuits and restrictive licensing. All the growth in value comes from people competing to offer services on open networks.
Google is one of those innovative competitors. I hope they can force Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, T-Mobile and the few other wireless carriers to join the 21st Century's openness and growth.
Asus is going to go Android as well (Score:3, Informative)
[Asus' phone] will roll out sometime in the first half of 2009 (we're guessing late first half),
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Errmmmm...and where, exactly, do you think Motorola, Nokia, Samsung, etc., all make their phones?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Mount doom.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)