Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

3G iPhone Going Into Production In May

Posted by CmdrTaco on Mon Mar 31, 2008 07:52 AM
from the i-just-want-double-the-space dept.
A few folks noted the rumor mill churning over 3G iPhones coming soon. Apparently they might be going into production as early as May, and announced somewhere in the 2nd quarter. Hopefully they manage to stick a GPS and another 16 gigs of memory in this one.
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 31 2008, @08:02AM (#22920118)
    A few folks noted the rumor mill churning over 3G iPhones coming soon.

    But my iPhone already has 8 gigs!
  • If it did, I'd buy it at any cost!
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      I just want ads blocked on my iphone. I tried editing the hosts file on my iphone, but it didn't work. Any suggestions? I need a solution on the iphone itself that will work anywhere.
  • day early? (Score:4, Funny)

    by Tom (822) on Monday March 31 2008, @08:13AM (#22920204) Homepage Journal
    Isn't this a day early?
  • WishList (Score:3, Interesting)

    by pinkocommie (696223) on Monday March 31 2008, @08:27AM (#22920322)
    1. AutoFocus/Flash for the Camera
    2. 3G
    3. GPS
    and I'm set, getting rid of a bunch of electronics for just one device :D
    What else do you guys think could be added?
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      I'm with you on the camera. My iPhone has become my primary camera just because it's always with me--even though the quality sucks. If they could boost the resolution, get the focus and color quality a little better, add a flash--all of that would be really nice. What I would really dig is if you could shoot quicktime with it. All of my point-n-shoot digital cameras shot video in quicktime. I'm really surprised the iPhone doesn't shoot any kind of video (even the little 15-30 second clips).

      I know everyo
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        I know everyone complains about EDGE, but I hope the 3G layers on top of the EDGE support. You can get EDGE just about anywhere--even if it is dog slow. Sometimes that's really handy.

        Maybe in the USA, but not elsewhere. Most of Europe skipped EDGE and went straight to UMTS and is now moving to HSDPA. In the UK, O2 (who got the exclusive deal for the iPhone) quickly rushed out EDGE in London, but not anywhere else, meaning that the iPhone has to fall back to GPRS in most of the country. My current phone support UMTS and the network has pretty good coverage - I only occasionally have to fall back to using GPRS, and I really notice the different (50KB/s downloads with 200ms ping times

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        The next app I want to see for the iPhone is going to be one that fully controls all the possible camera settings, f-stop, exposure time, light levels, color balance, etc. I don't know how much control the camera in the current iPhones has, but at some point in its development I want full control over every fiddly little parameter on the camera. Presets for outdoors, presets for indoors, presets for taking great shots in a stadium environment... it'd be grand.
  • FCC approval ? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Builder (103701) on Monday March 31 2008, @09:03AM (#22920662)
    Has anyone seen an FCC approval filing for this yet ?

    Surely since they had to pre-announce the first iPhone to protect against the FCC announcing it for them, we could expect to see a similar request before a 3G iPhone comes into being ?
  • by jmichaelg (148257) on Monday March 31 2008, @09:54AM (#22921136)
    Forget 3G. I'm curious if it'll have Michael Uy's Fly Eye Camera [google.com]. The patent is a couple of years old. I wonder if Apple is just sitting on the patent or if they're actively developing it.

    A key benefit of the camera is if you're on a video conference, your image will be looking straight at the camera instead of off screen.
  • who cares? (Score:3, Informative)

    by nguy (1207026) on Monday March 31 2008, @10:37AM (#22921638)
    I already have a 3.5G phone with a full WebKit-based browser, multi-tasking, and full programmability. It has a standard USB modem, GPS, a full Bluetooth stack, and tons of software. I can use as a tethered modem, via Bluetooth, and even use it as a WiFi access point using 3.5G for Internet access.

    The iPhone has crippled software, crippled hardware, and crippled contracts. There is no reason on earth to buy one.
  • by sco_robinso (749990) on Monday March 31 2008, @10:59AM (#22921940)
    Perhaps this will be what it takes to bring the phone into Canada? 2 of our 3 major providers are 3G (Telus, Bell), so it the 3G iPhone would make perfect sense as a starting point for a Canadian release.

    It's almost cruel how little Apple has said about a Canadian release (nothing). They haven't even hinted, nor have Telus, Bell, or Rogers. Only recently have we gotten a sign a 'something' in that there's a "French - Canadian" language seeting in the new 2.0 software.

    Sigh, I'll keep waiting.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Rogers has HSPDA rolled out in many major centres already and is going to be doing so at a rapid rate this year.
    • Re:why (Score:5, Informative)

      by CockMonster (886033) on Monday March 31 2008, @07:57AM (#22920066)
      Because the iPhone was a flop outside North America.
      • Also note, that in countries where the telecommunications system is in a stranglehold by a company dedicated to obsolete standards (NextG anyone?), the few providers of 3G are the only usable cellular data method, there is not EDGE so...

        Or as you said, if a flip flop saves a flop, well, meh.

        I stick to my nokia (edge, 3g, gsm, 802.11g) I think :)
      • Because the iPhone was a flop outside North America.
        And you'll see a lot of comments from Apple fanboi's defending Apple all the way, but here's the truth, uncensored. (Go ahead, mod me down, fanboi trolls) what a lot of North American (like myself) readers don't seem to understand is that while we just got 3G services and phones rolled out within the last 2 years by the likes of Sprint, Verizon, etc., here in the States, abroad, they've had 3G for quite sometime and are completely spoiled by it. In the EU, any smartphone that's not 3G is immediately destined for failure, especially since they're already rolling out '3.5G' and '4G' in Europe, while we think 3G is the newest thing, Europe is already moving on.
        • Re:why (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Bedemus (63252) on Monday March 31 2008, @08:33AM (#22920388)

          what a lot of North American (like myself) readers don't seem to understand is that while we just got 3G services and phones rolled out within the last 2 years by the likes of Sprint, Verizon, etc., here in the States, abroad, they've had 3G for quite sometime and are completely spoiled by it. In the EU, any smartphone that's not 3G is immediately destined for failure, especially since they're already rolling out '3.5G' and '4G' in Europe, while we think 3G is the newest thing, Europe is already moving on.
          What a lot of North American readers (like yourself) don't seem to understand is that the population density in the countries where 3G coverage is widespread justifies that widespread deployment of 3G technology by giving companies a speedier return on their investment.

          Such is the case for most of the connectivity technologies that see more rapid adoption overseas. There are large areas of the USA that are simply not densely populated enough to justify the expense of rolling out cutting-edge networks there. It isn't a matter of the US simply being behind the technological curve, as some like to assume.

          Pardon the PHB nature of this next statement, but these are the types of differences that turn a 3 year ROI into a 10 year ROI, and slow down adoption.
          • Re:why (Score:5, Informative)

            by Seahawk (70898) <tts@NosPAM.image.dk> on Monday March 31 2008, @09:25AM (#22920832) Homepage
            So - what is the reason for not having 3G on the east and west coast of USA? I would guess the population density there is comparable to most of Europe.

            And don't think we have 100% 3G coverage over here(Denmark) - far from it. I would guess by area we're around 40%(Complete guesstimate), but coverage by population is at least 80% - I see nothing that prevents USA from doing something similar.
          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            "What a lot of North American readers (like yourself) don't seem to understand..."

            I fail to see anything in the parent post that suggests that he doesn't understand. In fact, it's likely that he understands all too well. Perhaps rather than take an argumentative tone in response, you simply add your point to further reinforce the his.

            Now, if such large areas in the US can't justify 3G then how could they justify WiFi as an alternative? That is, after all, the Apple position on the matter.
          • Re:why (Score:4, Insightful)

            by noewun (591275) on Monday March 31 2008, @10:59AM (#22921938) Journal

            There are large areas of the USA that are simply not densely populated enough to justify the expense of rolling out cutting-edge networks there. It isn't a matter of the US simply being behind the technological curve, as some like to assume.

            This isn't true anymore. About 83% of the U.S. population lives in cities. We just aren't a rural country anymore. The simpler answer is that we have a de facto telecommunications monopoly in this country, and we all know how much monpolies love innovation.

    • Re:why (Score:5, Insightful)

      by MistaE (776169) on Monday March 31 2008, @08:07AM (#22920162) Homepage
      I don't think it is so soon. It's already almost been a year since the original came out.
       
      This isn't Apple's other electronic markets, cell phones are updated almost the time, and usually it's not just a "slap a stick of bigger memory on it and call it a day" sort of revision. They need and should be adding more features to compete with the rest of the market.
       
      With that said, I don't understand why the hell people keep begging for GPS, I just feel that there are so many other better self GPS only products that get the job done that Apple shouldn't bother with that market. Besides, if you're shelling out hundreds on an iPhone, I have a feeling you may have a GPS system of some sorts already.
      • We're tired of...

        "Three PDAs for the Elven Lords
        Seven cell phones for the Dwarf Lords and their halls of stone
        Nine MP3 players for the

        Three Cell Phones for the Elven-kings under the sky,
        Seven PDAs for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone,
        Nine MP3 players for Mortal Men doomed to die,

        We want...

        One Gadget the Dark Lord on his dark throne
        In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
        One Gadget to rule them all, One Gadget to find them,
        One Gadget to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
        In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

        ***

        (ie: I don't want a separate cell phone, PDA, MP3 player, GPS and batman utility belt. Especially NOT when the technology is available to easily have all 4 in a single device. And the only thing stopping it from happening is BS marketing idiots.)

      • by LWATCDR (28044) on Monday March 31 2008, @08:33AM (#22920380) Homepage Journal
        Because a GPS that network enabled is a great tool.
        Traveling? Want to find a restaurant? Just use your cell with GPS and you can even dial the number and make reservations. Yes auto GPS systems have that but do you carry them in your pocket? When you travel you may or may not have a GPS in your rental car. Yea you could take your portable one with you but what if you don't have a rental car and are just walking? What if you are riding with someone that doesn't have a GPS?
        Again it is always in my pocket. It is the same reason that I have web browser on my phone and a media player.
        It is always with me and it is small and light.
          • by sjbe (173966) on Monday March 31 2008, @09:14AM (#22920732)

            it [let's find a restaurant!] speaks to what seems to me to be a pretty narrow market/lifestyle segment. Maybe for the itenerant road warrior type. For me, i know every decent restaurant within miles (west surburban chicagoland) or at least enough. ditto in Chicago.
            You don't sound like someone who travels much. If you never leave the area where you live, no a GPS isn't going to help you much. But most of the population travels at least occasionally and some of us travel quite a lot. I have a Garmin nuvi [garmin.com] which I use all the time to find places to eat, hotels, parks, intersections, offices and of course for directions. I travel a fair bit (both work and pleasure) and a GPS is extremely useful when I do. I also just moved to a new city and it made it MUCH easier to learn my way around. If I could get the same features in my phone that would be even more useful. I never need directions anymore, just a destination address. It's great that you live in Chicago where there are wonderful options for dining all over the place. But I can tell you most of the country isn't like that. Even in Chicago it's often hard to find something if you don't know the city. (yes I've been there many times) Can you get by without a GPS? Of course. But just like you can get by without a computer it's still pretty handy if you have one available.
          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            Yea in my hometown I know my favorite places to eat. And no I don't need my GPS.
            But here are some examples of when I have used my GPS. My wife got us involved in a book club. The meeting was at a members. I had the address so I had no real problem finding it.
            I was in the Next town over and needed to find an ATM. GPS works just great for that.
            I stopped to get gas in that same town and an older gentleman asked me where the nearest Walmart was. I had no idea until I took out my Cell phone and did a search and
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        I do already have GPS but I really hope the next iPhone has it and is available soon. If the first version had GPS I would already own an iPhone and I probably wouldn't have a normal suction cup GPS. I would instead be suction cupping my iPhone to the windshield.

        Now that I have a good car GPS system to save me from getting lost all the time, I want one in my pocket. I can think of a few times when I have been out in a city on foot, and had to worry about getting lost. It would have been nice to have GPS
        • Re:why (Score:5, Informative)

          by DrgnDancer (137700) on Monday March 31 2008, @10:57AM (#22921898) Homepage
          Dude.. You live in Chicago, it's a grid, lucky you. Try to find your way around Houston or New Orleans without help sometime. It's a bona fide nightmare. New Orleans has streets that are parallel in one place and intersect in others, they call it a the "Crescent City" for a reason. It also has streets change names at random places for reasons that, while historically interesting, make no navigational sense. New Orleans is a bit unique by any standard, but most of what I like to call the "post-WW II Southern Cities" are huge sprawling things with little planning and often several "downtown areas" interspersed with residential subdivisions and bedroom communities. I've been to New York and Chicago, their well planned grid and awesome public transportation are things to be envied... Most of us do, because we don't have them.
          • Maps versus GPS (Score:4, Interesting)

            by sjbe (173966) on Monday March 31 2008, @10:01AM (#22921194)

            we're integrateing hundreds of dollars of technology with a multibillion dollar supporting infrastructure to replace a FOLDED PAPER MAP that we might need to use for TWO MINUTES EVERY THREE YEARS.
            When your folded map can:
            • give you street level directions for every road anywhere in ALL of North America and Europe
            • calculate optimal routes and detours
            • find the closest Chinese restaurant in a city you've never been to before and give you its phone number so you can order ahead
            • act as a speaker-phone via bluetooth for your cell phone
            • play MP3s
            • tell you that there is traffic ahead on the highway you are driving on

            then MAYBE you'll have a decent argument about why maps are superior in every way. Maps are useful to be sure but GPS devices do a lot more than just show where streets are located. I use my GPS almost daily. Bet you I get a lot more value out of my GPS than you do from your map.
      • With that said, I don't understand why the hell people keep begging for GPS...

        Because GPS is a VERY logical addition to a mobile device. Arguably more logical than a music player for many people. Any business traveler would likely find a GPS enabled phone (with appropriate navigation software) to be extremely useful. I think the GPS is the next logical device to see serious integration into smartphones (after PDAs and MP3 players) because it is such an obvious fit for mobile users.

        I have a Garmin nuvi 660 and a Nokia E70. Both are fine devices. But there are MANY times when car

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        Maybe that's the problem with the cell phone market. Too many new "features."

        My girlfriend just got a new phone to replace her two year old one that broke. The new one is almost imperceptibly smaller, the camera is slightly higher resolution, and the default ringtone is more annoying and more difficult to change.

        Apple has done very well by resisting the urge to cram more "features" into their devices. Most famously, the iPod.
        • Re: GPS (Score:4, Interesting)

          by peragrin (659227) on Monday March 31 2008, @08:54AM (#22920582)
          the locate feature is absolutely useless to me. there aren't enough wi-fi access points to be any good.

          Besides i don't want GPS built in. As GPS uses a ton a battery power. I want a Bluetooth, or other dongle that occasionally sends GPS data. Why can't I get a car dock, with a built in GPS receiver? Just plug the iPhone in I can listen to tunes, hook up the bluetooth to my car's bluetooth headset, and have driving map to go by all from one device.

          Unfortunately the SDK, and Apple's EULA's prevent exactly that from ever happening.
          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            Besides i don't want GPS built in. As GPS uses a ton a battery power
            Are you sure? GPS doesn't require the device to transmit anything.
            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              No, but it requires a high power receiver. GPS signals are some of the weakest ones you can actually use with consumer gear and it takes a lot of work (battery power) to get them.

              Worse, because GPS signals require so much work to read, receivers typically require several minutes to achieve a usable result from a cold start, so the option of leaving it off for the 99% of the time you're not using it is less appealing because staring at a busy cursor on your phone for 5 minutes sucks when you just want s
    • by MistaE (776169) on Monday March 31 2008, @08:11AM (#22920190) Homepage
      Never underestimate the power of the 'coolness' factor. Also, you write off the nicer interface as if its somewhat insignificant. That's the CORE component of any consumer electronic market. The public is going to interact with the most part through the interface, if it sucks, they're not going to spend the time to learn it.

      Like it or hate it, you got to admit that the iPhone has a pretty nice interface and it's not too hard to learn. When my mom and aunts, who are in their 40s and not very technologically adept, decided to pick up iPhones and can use them as well as me, you know they're doing something right.
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        That's what sold me (initially). I have to admit, I was a first adopter based on the WOW factor.

        My old Motorolla V551 took a hard hit and was knocked out cold. I needed a phone - fast... I walked into the Cingular/AT&T store, asked to see a phone that would do more than just be a phone... So I looked at Palm... Been there, done that, have the t-shirt from Handspring... *yawn* --- I looked at Blackberry... too fruity for me... --- I then took a serious look at the (then) top of the line Windows Mobile

    • by ironwill96 (736883) on Monday March 31 2008, @08:18AM (#22920252) Homepage Journal
      It all boils down to this: what the iPhone does it does well.

      I have used other smart phones such as the Motorola Q and the Blackberry, but the iPhone is the simplest to use for what I want: easy to access and read e-mail and web browsing and a phone. It also does simple things like work as my calculator, a calendaring system, take notes on it, do alarms, stop-watch, stock quotes, weather and whatever else you download for it now. And oh yeah, it is my iPod too and I synch it with Bluetooth to my car for use as hands-free.

      As someone else already pointed out, the ease of use and interface are the key things that a good smartphone really needs - and Apple succeeded quite well with their first try. Yes, it didn't have 3G or GPS built-in for the first pass at it, but future versions most certainly will. Once they add the rest of those features, i'll be surprised at what people will find to complain about it then. It will probably never have enough memory for the complainers and i'm sure the DRM and device lock-down are also something to continue to complain about, but i'm happy with the phone now just as much (or more than) I was when I bought mine back in September after they lowered the price on it. Now if only AT&T could get some better coverage around where I live :-)
      • by Admiral Ag (829695) on Monday March 31 2008, @08:36AM (#22920404)
        The iPhone could be equipped with a perpetual motion machine and a love ray that instantly seduces any woman it is aimed at, and some people would still complain that it doesn't support MMS, and thus they would rather have their free flip phone.

        Don't underestimate the power of the dark side.
          • by Pretor (2506) on Monday March 31 2008, @09:39AM (#22920976)
            I'll give you several

            1: Ease of use.
            2: High quality software - few software bugs
            3: Ipod
            4: Very good web browser
            5: Some very nice third party software (if you jailbrake it)

            I've also have a Nokia E90 - so I'm able to compare my iPhone to a more feature full phone. This is a phone that has almost all the features that you could imagine. 3.5G, GPS, SIP client, multi megapixel camera, keyboard and etc. This is similar to other expensive Nokia phones.

            The problems with the Nokia phones are:

            1. Several different confusing menus - the series 60 is awful to use
            2. Lots and lots of bugs, several that freezes the phones
            3. Terrible multimedia software
            4: Good web browser with bad user interface. Nokia calls it Safari (webkit) based, but the interface is miles away from the iPhone

            Yes my Nokia E90 has it bright spots. For example I bring it along on my travels because of it's GPS and its SIP client. Additionally the keyboard makes it nice using ssh to check problems with servers and etc. And it's really nice to have 3.5G Internet access. But since it's awful to use as a day to day phone it's mostly left at home.

            BTW: I live in Oslo, the main capital of Norway. An area with very good 3G and 3.5G coverage. So I know what I'm missing with just the EDGE network.
    • by mdwh2 (535323) on Monday March 31 2008, @08:22AM (#22920262) Journal
      The other reply got modded flamebait, but the spirit of the answer was correct - consider how it's not just marketing from Apple themselves, but from phone shops that promote it, and news media from Slashdot to the BBC. What's this - a news article not about the release of Iphone, but simply a new version supporting a feature that's long been a standard? Most phones don't get a story at all.

      Apple appear to be taking advantage that many people are unaware how almost every phone (even cheap ones) can do Internet access as standard, so they are able to promote it as a new and wonderful thing (even on Slashdot, I see this happening).

      (And it's not clear it has "succeeded" apart from in the sense of not flopping? Sure it's succeeded, but so has the Treo and many other phones, but if you mean been a success above all others, that's not clear at all to me.)
      • by teh kurisu (701097) on Monday March 31 2008, @08:45AM (#22920482) Homepage

        Apple appear to be taking advantage that many people are unaware how almost every phone (even cheap ones) can do Internet access as standard, so they are able to promote it as a new and wonderful thing (even on Slashdot, I see this happening).

        I'm sure they're also attracting the people that have tried out the browsers on their phones, and found them so painful to use that they've just given up. I'm one of them - I never use the browser on my Samsung Z560 unless I really have to. In contrast, I'll browse the web on my iPod Touch quite happily - it's not as good as a desktop browser, but it's not that far off.

        In fact, I was ranting to my boss just now about the fact that my phone browser forgets cookies when the browser is closed (which happens every time you close the clamshell, annoyingly). It's particularly apparent when using PayPal Mobile, which shows you a regular login page by default. You can opt to log in using your mobile number and a PIN, and if you've got the cookie you'll be automatically redirected. Mine, unfortunately, forgets the cookie.

        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          Not only that, but the iPhone is free of all the crap that the networks insist on putting on your phone.

          T-Mobile UK have intentionally made my Samsung Z560 more annoying to use. The most infuriating example is the web browser's bookmarks list. At the top of the list are two bookmarks for 'T-Mobile Favourites' and 't-zones'. You can't delete them, or even move them to another position on the list. The worst part is that the phone only shows three bookmarks on the screen at a time, you have to scroll to

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      The interface is just about all that matters in a cell phone. I am sick and tired of cell phones with user interfaces that SUCK. The iPhone has a pioneering full-surface touchscreen display just like I envisioned. It rolls a great mp3 player in. It's thin enough to fit in a jeans pocket without anyone noticing, thinner than most phones. Those are all killer features. Smartphones? Barf. A rehash of Treo? Get out of here.

      I'll definitely be getting a 2nd gen...
    • Why do iPods outsell other MP3 players? You can tout their UI or iTunes, but I honestly believe it comes down to the fact that they look cool and, perhaps more importantly, many folks who buy them are trying to also make a fashion (or cultural) statement. No longer does one need to have an opinion on individual issues...or evaluate the superiority of a specific product. No...all you need to do is grab a brand and slap it on your forehead.

      Someone mentioned that the iPhone is essentially a sexed-up Treo.
    • by dfghjk (711126) on Monday March 31 2008, @09:44AM (#22921022)
      The Treo did succeed and it would be more successful now if its software wasn't of such poor quality. The iPhone does many things better than the Treo even ignoring the Treo's stability problems.

      The Treo concept remains a desirable one so you answered your own question. The company that does the best job with this type of device will succeed. Right now it is Apple (among others).
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      as a former treo 700p user it's because.....

      you don't have to reboot it 5 times a day and it doesn't have interface lag switching between networks.
      Oh the web browser is actually useable.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      I was thinking about this the other day. Why does the iPhone "succeed"? It is essentially a rehash of a Treo. Sure, it has a nicer interface, but is that it?

      I have the palm version of the Treo. It is complete shite.

      Form factor first, it is heavy and the antenna sticks out. The stylus fell out of the pocket long ago and they charge Apple prices for a replacement - $20 for three pointy sticks. I am now on my third replacement in two years. Some people I know have been through six.

      The browser is crud. It

    • Why the original iphone didn't get all these features I'll never know

      Cost. The thing is already $400-$500. Imagine if you added all of those "features"...
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Why would you want a standard 3.5mm headphone jack? You wouldn't be able to take calls on the earphones. The jack still works for regular headphones already, so what's the problem.
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          That sounds like a physical problem, not a standards problem unless a standard 3.5mm jack is required to have a certain amount of space around it.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Given your suggestions, I think we'll see the following on the 2G Apple iPhone:

      1) 3G high-speed data download support through HSDPA (which AT&T is implementing in major metropolitan areas).
      2) Maximum flash memory increased to 32 GB, the same as the top-line iPod Touch.
      3) Improved onboard camera with 4-5 megapixel capability.
      4) Bigger capacity battery (though this will increase the thickness of the iPhone about 2-3 mm).
      5) Improved transceiving antenna, very necessary for HSDPA connections.
      6) Optional sof