Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Modu Unveils Modular, Transformer-style Phone

Posted by Zonk on Thu Feb 07, 2008 02:08 PM
from the roll-your-own-phone dept.
Cellphones Hardware Hacking
An anonymous reader writes "A company called Modu has come up with an innovative take on a mobile phone. Instead of giving you the finished product, you get a base unit and a choice of 'sleeves', which you can plug the base unit into and turn it into a variety of devices. "If, for example, you're going out clubbing, you can pop it into a fashion sleeve with a fancy design. If you're on a business trip and you need a phone with a Qwerty keypad and large screen, you just have to pop it into a 'jacket' with those features." There's also the option to plug it into a satellite navigation device or even a car stereo. While it seems like an interesting system, I wonder whether modular devices are better than buying standalone products or all-in-one products?"
+ -
story

Related Stories

Submission: Modu unveils transformer-style phone by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Modu Unveils Modular, Transformer-style Phone 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Me to have a QWERTY keyboard without having a camera (no camera phones at my job), then I'll buy one. As would a lot of my co-workers, since they aren't springing for us to all buy Blackberries.
    • They list the price for this as 200 euros to 150 pounds - so about $300. That's the same cost as a Blackberry so if you or your employer won't buy one of those, you probably aren't getting one of these either.
      • Except that a lot of tech is very nearly dollar-for-pound. So yes if you work in the UK you might have problems, but if you're in the US it could cost as little as $150.
    • You work at the CIA or something?
      • he doesn't have to work for the CIA.. just about every fortune 500 company doesn't allow camera's (including the ones in phones) into their R&D departments. also any company that has a unique proccess for manufacturing doesn't allow them.

        when you go work for the CIA or other places with that level of information security.. you don't get to take any phone and some times you arn't even allowed to see where you are going.
        • IANASA, but I would bet that, if you're at such a clearance level that you're allowed to see "ultra super top secret, eyes only" type information, they don't care if you know where you went to look at it. I suspect that a lot of the stuff you see in movies is for dramatic purposes only. But then, how would we know?
          • well i and others that i work with know.. we are out side consultants.. some times we are only cleared for X area and if we have to go through a restricted area well - and it isn't "ultra super top" it is just information that they don't want shared with either the public at large or competting companies.
            • That all sounds reasonable. I was replying to: some times you arn't even allowed to see where you are going. That conjures up visions of blindfolded agents in the back of black sedans being taken to "undisclosed locations" for receipt of classified information. That sounds like somewhat of a stretch to me.
        • This is becoming more common at regular employers...I work for a large bank, and in many job functions they don't allow camera phones on the production floor; basically anywhere there is proprietary or confidential info laying around, including sensitive customer information, posters with production metrics, whiteboards with strategic plans scribbled on, etc.
          • saddly enough i know of one company that doesnt' allow cameras in the production facility due to posiable OSHA violations - not that the phone would violate OSHA rules - but they don't want photo evidence of OSHA violations being sent out before they company even knows they exist, very paranoid but true.. they are worried that a disgruntaled employee would set up an area to be unsafe take the picture and then turn the company in.

            It is easier for the company to disalow cameras without permission than to par
    • Check out the last picture:

      http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/0,39029453,49295452-4,00.htm [cnet.co.uk]

      I want one of those Boom buttons for my work keyboard. Maybe every time I hit it the whole building shudders under a big BOOM... Would be a fun way of getting rid of the loud people talking in the hallway in front of my door...
  • would certainly NOT want to bump into a Decepticon on the dance floor.....

    • Re:I for one (Score:5, Funny)

      by NecroPuppy (222648) on Thursday February 07 2008, @02:16PM (#22337928) Homepage
      What, not even Soundwave?
      • Okay, maybe soundwave [bigbadtoystore.com]...

        Yes, they come in blue too...

      • would certainly NOT want to bump into a Decepticon on the dance floor.....

        What, not even Soundwave?

        For those new to the intarwebs, you might not have seen the Soundwave breakdancing video. [youtube.com]

        And because these things often go uncredited for some strange reason (laziness?):

        Directed and Produced by Charlie Bayliss
        Co-Directed by Irfan Nathoo
        Producer Mark Wilenkin
        3D Modeling and Animation by Charlie Bayliss
        Additional 3D Modeling by Dan Kohn
        Composited and Edited by Mark Wilenkin
        Music by LAZER
        Studio_w and LAZER Mu

  • open system? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by lobiusmoop (305328) on Thursday February 07 2008, @02:20PM (#22337980) Homepage
    Anybody know if this is an open design? If there is support for third parties to develop and sell sleeves without heavy licencing limitations it might be interesting. Otherwise it will probably go the way of betamax - overtaken by cheaper, more widely supported alternatives.

  • so- if I unsderstand correctly-- (Score:3, Insightful)

    by way2trivial (601132) on Thursday February 07 2008, @02:21PM (#22338018) Homepage Journal
    it's a giant sim card?

    isn't all that possible with moving a sim card from phone to phone?

    do we really need the intermediate step? I know people who move their sim from a sleek 'heading out' to a pdaphone.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by netsavior (627338)
      I move my SIM card from my Treo to a tiny flip phone a lot, because the Treo is crap for talking on the phone, and the flip phone is crap for everything else.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by ardyng (973980)

      Actually, it appears to be a very basic phone unit, with the transmitter, antenna, etc, built in. Think of it like a cell phone PC Card [wikipedia.org] that can plug into a variety of host devices.

      Only real difference is it seems to have a base functionality without the host.

      • Think of it like a cell phone PC Card that can plug into a variety of host devices.

        I'm not sure where people got the idea that this phone-gadget was like an oversized SIM card. A SIM card is basically a low-capacity flash-memory card with keys for identity and encryption. This device is basically an entire cellphone, which I understand is functional all on its own at a basic level. The closest thing to this is the W-SIM card which is a SIM with a cellular transceiver welded to its back, but even that lac
    • Exactly. Their idea is a new bad(probably more expensive) way to do something already possible and easy to do.

      • Exactly. Their idea is a new bad(probably more expensive) way to do something already possible and easy to do.
        That's the brilliance. They are practically assured a Microsoft buyout. Well, if there's any cash left over after Yahoo, that is...

    • it's a giant sim card?

      My thoughts exactly. A SIM card with more capacity and more functionality would be just as good. The only thing the SIM really lacks is the ability to store music and pictures. I suppose you could just use an SD card for that.

      The only way I could see this being useful is because if you buy it you are stuck with proprietary technology and can't easily switch over to a different phone manufacturer. (useful for the company not the consumer)

    • Re:so- if I unsderstand correctly-- (Score:5, Interesting)

      by mea37 (1201159) on Thursday February 07 2008, @02:59PM (#22338854)
      The two differences seem to be

      1) The base device can supposedly function "stand-alone"; however, it looks like it must be a pain to use in that way. Not sure the advantage of using it stand-alone...

      2) The base device brings more of the "common" functionality with it from jacket to jacket, so there's no need to buy that piece of the system over and over again.

      There's an intuitive feel that (2) creates an economic advantage, and I guess for someone who would otherwise buy multiple mobile devices there might be (depending on the actual pricing, factoring in bundling -- which seems to defeat the point, but whatever). Is it cost-advantageous if I only use it with one jacket? Two? Five? How many cell-based devices do I have to "need" before this becomes economically useful to me?

      That's my question, then: how much need does any given person have for a bunch of devices to which he or she can add cell phone capabilities? The car radio looking thing and the nav device might be interesting if they integrate the cell service in an interesting way, but couldn't you do the same thing wtih an inexpensive data cable to the phone (and maybe a car mounting kit, which you can easily get today)? The only particular advantage to building the devices this way (IMO) would be to leverage an already-existing deployment of Modu base units, and clearly there's not one.

      As for the hand-held sleeves, like one with a larger screen and QWERTY keyboard... maybe useful, but are there trade-offs (like is the combined device bulky or otherwise clumsy when compared to a stand-alone unit)?

      Then again, the fact that they lead with the example of a "stylish" cover you'd use to go clubbing probably indicates that I'm not the target audience, since I find that indescribaly stupid.
  • I would love to have something like "transputer" - it would be CPU with huge memory (10GB+) and I could plug it into phone doc. paltop/GPS dock or PC dock (with extra powerful CPU) with large monitor or notebook dock. Have Linux everywhere, have similar environment everywhere ... Truly "transported computer". Same data, used in different ways...
  • A core phone should be as small and sexy as possible - like the iphone or razor (in its past life). Small is good while maintaining as much functionality as possible. This is clearly the trend. On this core device various extensibility options must exist. For example larger batteries, external keyboards, handfree kits, 'bling' headsets, cool cases etc. Again this trend already exists and is being built on various dock connectors, including usb, and wireless mechanisms like bluetooth.

    This Modu thing is just

  • Hmm (Score:3, Funny)

    by sskagent (1170913) <(blackspade01) (at) (gmail.com)> on Thursday February 07 2008, @02:47PM (#22338572) Homepage

    .....you're going out clubbing....

    Unless 'going clubbing' means taking a +1 Club of Awesomeness, this particular example is worthless to the /. crowd.
  • Wouldn't it be easier to just move a SIM card to the current necessary device?
    • My sim card is under my battery, under the lid, under a really sturdy extra cover. I think this is just a bit easier.

  • Er... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by brunes69 (86786) <slashdot.keirstead@org> on Thursday February 07 2008, @03:10PM (#22339076) Homepage
    I already have this. It's called a SIM card. If I am going out on the town and want to have a small compact phone I put my SIM in my Razr. If I am going to work or traveling and want a PDA I put it in my HTC Wizard.

    What is the benefit of this, other than the fact that they want me to likely spend as much on a "sleeve" as I do for a complete unlocked phone on eBay?

    • Re:Er... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by GlassHeart (579618) on Thursday February 07 2008, @05:27PM (#22341402) Journal

      Many Slashdot readers do not understand that while convenience is a sliding scale, there are important thresholds along the way that enable (or disable) certain applications. For example, what you state is entirely correct: you can swap SIM cards around different devices.

      However, most people don't do that regularly, probably because you generally have to remove a battery to reveal the SIM slot and so on. The SIM is also not designed to be plugged and unplugged many times, so you may develop contact problems after a while. Finally, the SIMs that I'm familiar with can't generally store all the data (full contact information, email logs, browser bookmarks, etc.) that you want to take along with you.

      So, if the idea is to switch "sleeves" daily or more than daily, then the SIM solution is just not convenient enough. Not to say this Modu phone will solve it, but no, you don't already have this.

      • Sounds like you are proposing a simcard sleeve - a simcard inserted into a simple and small package that adds a rugged connector and some flash memory that can easily be switched from phone to phone. It's actually a great idea and likely hasn't already been developed because of current vendor lock-in policies.

        LS
  • Oh, like an iPAQ sleeve? The original Compaq iPAQs were the size of a smartphone, but had sleeves which could add a compact-flash socket, or GPS receiver, or PCMCIA slot, or dual PCMCIA slot, or dual CF slots. No reason why you couldn't have a very small cellphone, without camera, stereo speakers, flipphone, etc, and add those features via a sleeve.
  • Lots of people here denounce this technology because "we already have SIM cards." Therefore, no new technology must be developed? No alternative technologies in use in the world should see improvement?

    CDMA phone users don't care about SIM cards. If this technology were available on a CDMA phone, I could see it catching on. Especially since there is no good way to move data between CDMA phones and no standard across manufacturers.

  • Looks like we're all Transformers now (Score:4, Funny)

    by esper (11644) on Thursday February 07 2008, @05:51PM (#22341818) Homepage
    OK, so "If, for example, you're going out clubbing, you can pop it into a fashion sleeve with a fancy design. If you're on a business trip and you need a phone with a Qwerty keypad and large screen, you just have to pop it into a 'jacket' with those features." makes it a "modular, Transformer-style phone".

    Does that mean that if I start out in my underwear (the "base unit") and then, if I'm going out clubbing, I put on some fashionable clothes, possibly incorporating fancy designs, then later go on a business trip wearing a suit and tie, plus maybe pop on a wristwatch for some extra functionality, does that make me a "modular, Transformer-style human"?
    • does that make me a "modular, Transformer-style human"?

      No, just a geek for considering the possibility.

  • Why not just have a black-box "communcations device?" Something that can sit in your pocket, purse, backpack, whatever and just offer bluetooth services to a variety of devices. Have a handset if you want one, a graphical display if that suits you, or any other device that can communicate via bluetooth to your hidden communications device? Yea, you'd need to charge everything up separately, but so what? You'd get a hell of a lot more functionality out of the modular devices. And network flexibility

  • I have one of those. It's called a SIM card.
  • Cellular, modular, interactive-odular...

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by TubeSteak (669689)

      About the only innovation here is to call it innovation.
      Sleeves for personalizing gizzmos is about as old as forever.
      Sleeves that provide different functionality?
      Show me a phone that already does that.
      • Yeah, I think grandparent missed the point. This thing lets you plug in different parts, not just cosmetic changes. Almost like plugging in peripherals to your laptop. Add a mouse, add a webcam, whatever.
      • Ipaqs have had something similar for years now. You can get sleeves to do many things, even turn them into phones, plus there are Ipaq phones which you can buy sleeves. For.

        And I think they have been doing it for years. I remember seeing them in 2004.
      • ipaqs has sleeves since inception. These added GPRS, GPS, CF and other functions.

        Modular systems are nothing new.

      • GSM phones that use a SIM card. The phone number, and phone book reside on the SIM, and your contract is attached to the numbers on it. You can then take the SIM and use it in any handset you like.

        This is just a repackaging of this concept where the core phone bit is included in the removable part, so you wouldn't need to duplicate all the radio electronics in each of your handsets.

        Lots of people already have a PDA and a sleek handset that they move their SIM back and forth between.

        A big advantage is that y

        • Lots of people already have a PDA and a sleek handset that they move their SIM back and forth between.

          I'm one of those people. This idea intrigues me because I'd sure like something easier than my current method:

          1. Remove smart phone from leather holster.
          2. Remove smart phone batter door cover.
          3. Remove smart phone battery.
          4. Extract SIM from smart phone holder.
          5. Replace smart phone battery.
          6. Replace smart phone battery cover.
          7. Replace smart phone leather holster.
          8. Remove slim phone battery door cover.
          9. Remove slim phone battery.
          10. Flip up slim phone MiniSD holder.
          11. Insert SIM into slim phone.
          12. R

          • Same here...I keep a Blackberry and Razr handy and have to swap the SIM for the purpose at hand...BB is a crap phone, but sometimes I need to check email on the road.
        • It's possible to get a second-hand mobile data card for less than $15 from E-bay. You just plug it in yuour laptop with a SIM card and you are online. If you could get a hand-held PDA/PC with a PCMCIA slot you could more or less build your own mobile phone. If it had a touch sensitive LCD display, you could build your own i-Phone.
      • Old Handsprings and their "cartridge" style gizmos

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.