Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Asus N10 Review — the First Netbook For Gaming

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Fri Sep 26, 2008 05:04 PM
from the getting-stronger-all-the-time dept.
Kim Hawley writes "Mobile Computer has a review of another new netbook from Asus. The N10 comes from Asus’ notebook division rather than its Eee PC division, and has an impressive specification. Most notable are the ExpressCard/34 slot and switchable nVidia GeForce 9300M graphics, and the video shows the N10 playing Call of Duty 4 very smoothly. Pre-orders in the US are around $600 – about the same as the Eee PC 1000. The N10 is closer to a traditional laptop than a true netbook, though – is feature-creep killing this new market already?"
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by compumike (454538) on Friday September 26 2008, @05:09PM (#25172265) Homepage

    From TFA:

    In addition to the same so-so Intel 945 graphics found on other netbooks, the N10 also has a discrete nVidia GeForce 9300M graphics chipset - enabled with the flick of a switch (and a reboot)

    Very strange feature, definitely the first I've heard of this. You would really think that they could be able to power down enough of the 9300M to compare with the 945. But I guess they did the math and it makes sense to include two separate graphics controllers?

    Seems like a pain to have to reboot to play games... but I guess I already do that between Debian/Windows. :-/

    --
    Hey code monkey... learn electronics! Powerful microcontroller kits for the digital generation. [nerdkits.com]

    • by Zardus (464755) <Zardus@nbwrpg.com> on Friday September 26 2008, @05:14PM (#25172323) Homepage Journal

      The tech's been around since the beginning of the year at least. I first ran across this while shopping for a new laptop in February -- some of the Sony Vaio models had come out with it by then. Now a few other people have it as well (obviously). From what I understand, it makes a pretty decent impact on battery life.

    • Seems like a pain to have to reboot to play games...

      It seems retro to me... sonny.

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      This feature has been available on Sony SZ laptops for quite a few years now.
    • by Sancho (17056) * on Friday September 26 2008, @06:14PM (#25172827) Homepage

      Seems like a pain to have to reboot to play games... but I guess I already do that between Debian/Windows. :-/

      That's not how I'd use it. Most of the time, I have my notebook plugged into an outlet, so I'd just use the power-hungry card. I'd reboot any time I plan on using the machine away from an outlet for an extended period of time.

  • wow (Score:5, Insightful)

    by atari2600 (545988) on Friday September 26 2008, @05:12PM (#25172305)

    I personally feel laptops aren't good enough for serious gaming. Even though you connect a mouse, the keyboard still cannot match up to a regular size keyboard. There is the issue of heat and needing to be hooked up for max CPU freq and display brightness. Don't get me wrong - I love gaming laptops - they make great machines for development and running VMware images but in general I laugh at the idea of gaming laptops (upgrades? *smirk*).

    Gaming netbook though in my opinion borders on ridiculous. The N10 has a 10.2" screen. Checking the AH in wow sure. Using counterstrike as an expensive chat client while you idle in the start zone? Sure. Playing Solitaire and Bejewelled? Sure. Serious gaming? F that.

    • Re:wow (Score:5, Insightful)

      by ducomputergeek (595742) on Friday September 26 2008, @05:21PM (#25172373) Homepage

      I have a friend who has a 17" gaming laptop and on occastion we'll hook up at the coffee shop and play around of Ghost Recon 1. (Yes the original version). I'm usually playing on a 12.1" PowerBook and there is a hell of a difference. He can snipe me down because he can easily see the movement on his screen. There are places where he can be running and I can barely make him out.

      Same if I play Halo on the Mac, but not quite as bad.

      I know, 2001 called and want their games back, but my point is that 17" vs. 12" screens do make a difference..

      • Are you running windows on that Mac? GR1 was my favorite game ever, but I can't bring myself to install Windows just to play it.
      • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

        I know, 2001 called and want their games back, but my point is that 17" vs. 12" screens do make a difference..

        I remember, oh, in 2002 or 2003 I upgraded from my 15" (14 viewable) Sony Trinitron CRT. Part of the reason I was hanging on to it for so long was because it was easy to take to LAN parties (easy, relatively speaking). Me and my friends were diehard Quake III players back then. Most of my friends had at least 17" monitors, and a couple had 19" monitors. Let me tell you, I wasn't terrible at Q3A with the Trinitron, but when I upgraded to a 19" Viewsonic CRT, the next LAN was totally a night and day show

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        > I know, 2001 called and want their games back

        I really love the games from before ~5 years ago. Top-down GTAs, Jedi Knight series, Q3... Say, you can be a serious gamer even with a GeForce 2. You just play games that were released before GeForce 2 was on the market. It isn't like a game that was absolutely brilliant (Diablo 2 for example) suddenly became something less just because a few new ones were released in the meantime.

        The most important factor in games is the fun factor, and there are thousands

    • True, I normally prefer a desktop for gaming, but some people enjoy using a laptop for everything. Especially with companies starting to cater to this market, coming up with technologies like this.

      Plus, laptops are awesome for LAN parties (less power consumption, smaller size, etc)
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        but some people enjoy using a laptop for everything

        Most college students who travel great distances to their schools, like myself, have laptops. I'm not a gamer (though I do enjoy the occasional game of Halo), but bringing a desktop & monitor cross country seems kind of inconvenient, regardless of how much of a gamer one is.

        • No reason you can't bring along an extra monitor, keyboard and mouse and just use the laptop in a shut configuration. That's what I do when I'm at work anyway. It's still easier carrying around a laptop bag than a medium sized desktop case. You'd still have to bring along a monitor unless you want to risk leaving the laptop open to food/drink as you say, but if that is a problem, just be thankful that you don't have to lug around CRTs anymore! 21" CRTs are crazy heavy :P

    • I'm sure your gaming rig does real well on space conservation and portability.

    • Or you can do what I do and use a docking station, so I use my logitech keyboard/mouse and 21" monitor. My fujitsu t4010 has a 12" screen, weighs about 3.5 pounds, is a tablet PC, and can play Spore and Sins of a Solar Empire on low settings.

      • There's this new invention that might be just the thing for you. It's a kind of load-bearing device, deceptively simple really - just a flat surface supported by one or several "legs". I believe in industry lingo such devices are called "tables".
        • They're called laptops for a reason! Except these ones are netbooks. So perhaps they are to be rested on top of a modem and held like a book.

            • Meh, I'd never really thought about it before. Try this Dell link [dell.com]. Notebooks, subnotebooks etc are still all just subcategories of 'laptop', and a desktop is still a desktop even if it goes under your desk :p Some other poster pointed out that some manufacturers may be scared of lawsuits about burned laps and such so that's why the term laptop isn't used as often. Perhaps for the Dell US site they avoid the term completely, but people in the UK still haven't given in to the sue-happy culture quite yet (thou

        • oh, you mean like a desk?
        • My DESKTOP COMPUTER is sitting on it.

          I type this laying on my bed - with my "laptop" lying next to me. And before you guys make the predictable "that's all you'll ever have lying next to you" jokes, I first got this laptop so I could play video games lying next to my girlfriend as she does her homework on her laptop.
      • My Dell M170 video card and mobo choked after about a year and a half due to heat. Fortunately, I had a two year warranty. After that mess was cleared up, I extended the warranty out another 3 years, the max I could buy for that machine.

  • Hmm... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by fuzzyfuzzyfungus (1223518) on Friday September 26 2008, @05:15PM (#25172327) Journal
    It's almost like firms hate catering to the ultra low end, with its vanishingly small margins, or something...

    Feature creep can hardly be said to be "killing" the netbook market, as long as cheap low end netbooks continue to be sold; but one does get the impression that Asus et al. would love for you to consider something a little more expensive. The market that toys like this will probably kill is the ultra-high-end mini notebook segment.

    The high end mini notebook market has been around for years, Sony probably being the most notable. Classic netbooks are a threat, in that they skim off the people who want portability but don't need high end features but might have purchased a mini notebook because they were the only thing going; but they are too wimpy to kill the segment. However, as seems to happen a lot in technology, cheap crap is better at moving upmarket while staying cheap than premium gear is at moving downmarket while staying good. With the vast bulk of 300-400 dollar netbooks floating around, modest upgrades in spec and build quality, like the device reviewed in TFA, are still cheap and small; but are almost as good is the high end mini notebooks of old.

    I'm not predicting the total doom of that segment, some people are still willing to pay a premium for the best; but I suspect that this system, and others like it, really annoy the traditional makers of high end mini notebooks.
    • by mangu (126918) on Friday September 26 2008, @06:00PM (#25172715)

      I suspect that this system, and others like it, really annoy the traditional makers of high end mini notebooks.

      This is something that has been extensively and well discussed in this book [businessweek.com]. Traditional companies always have a lot of difficulty trying to compete with new products that come from "below", i.e. have less features but are cheaper than the current products.

      Mini-computers killed almost all of the old mainframe manufacturers, just like personal computers put the mini-computer sellers out of business. Now it's the time for the PC manufacturers to feel the heat, I expect a big restructuring of the whole industry in the next few years.

      • Interesting excerpt, I may need to pick that one up. Incidentally, netbooks seem to be absolutely textbook instances of disruptive innovation:

        "Generally disruptive innovations were technologically straightforward, consisting of off-the-shelf components put together in a product architecture that was often simpler than prior approaches. They offered less of what customers in established markets wanted and so could rarely be initially employed there. They offered a different package of attributes valued onl
  • Nonsense! (Score:4, Funny)

    by telchine (719345) on Friday September 26 2008, @05:16PM (#25172333)

    You want a netbook for gaming?! The Eee does it all! Perfect controller as well!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QSW9qOM6FM [youtube.com]

  • The Eee PC 1000 should be much less than $600. I live in Europe so I am not sure about the prices in the US, but here in EU it's one of the cheapest laptopsin general, let alone among the ultraportables!

  • I have been looking for something that I can develop on the go (needs battery life) as well as run the games I am devving (needs graphics card). This has me really excited. If it lives up I will probably be purchasing one.
  • more of a preview (Score:3, Informative)

    by gEvil (beta) (945888) on Friday September 26 2008, @05:32PM (#25172463)
    This is more of a preview rather than a review, especially since they mention they'll post their full review next week.
  • Simply being a personal opinion, I believe that traditional notebooks will see a sale rise in 2009.

    When the EEE was announced I made a bet with a friend as to whether netbooks would shake the notebook market up and turn it a little inside out, and yes, they did.

    But looking at what I feel I would buy when I wanted a portable computer, during all of 2008 I strongly felt I'd get some kind of netbook (I particularily had my eye on the Acer devices), but now i feel that I'd really want a normal work machin
    • I have a dual screen desktop at home, and a laptop issued for work, that stays docked at work. My personal laptop, I don't use... It's a bit much to lug around, even though not huge, and when I do, the screen is too small for me to work comfortably on (15.4"). I'm debating between an Android Phone (T-mobile G1) and a MSI Wind (6-cell battery is why other options are pretty much out).

      My main plans are a portable device for email and chat... the MSI Wind can handle thunderbird, xchat and pidgin fine. No
  • is feature-creep killing this new market already?

    The market will define itself, not what hand-wringers think it should be. If the slightly-larded up Netbooks sell, well then, that's the market. If the race to the bottom, barebones lappies are what people want, then that will be what the market produces.

    Markets don't die, they adapt to what consumers want, not how neato some people think a sub-$500 laptop is for society.
  • stop it (Score:5, Insightful)

    by PopeRatzo (965947) * on Friday September 26 2008, @05:54PM (#25172657) Homepage Journal

    is feature-creep killing this new market already?

    Do we care more about having a lot of different options for the user, or about protecting this "new market"?

    I really don't think that every new useful product has to become part of some special "market" just because reviewers and marketing people feel the need to categorize and simplify absolutely everything.

    I've seen too many good, innovative products die on the vine because the PR machine didn't quite know what to do with it. And have no doubt, sites like Mobile Computing, Engadget, Gizmodo, are nothing but cogs in the giant Moloch of the marketing departments and soap peddlers who have created this consumerist dystopia.

    If it's a good product, it doesn't have to be destroyed just because it doesn't fit neatly on a tab of some big box store's website.

    • Yeah, but it seems to me the whole concept was that these are ultra-cheap PCs that aren't really good for a whole lot of serious computing, but are perfectly fine for surfing the net. Hence, "netbook."

      If this thing is even half good enough for its intended purpose, isn't it sort of a ... gamebook, or something?

      Further, I always thought "gamer PC" meant "tricked-out, high performance machine with emphasis on the graphics card and a bunch of blue LEDs in the case." The concept of marketing a "gamer system" th

    • sometimes it really seems like people are just here to serve the economy rather than the other way around. that's why i'm always baffled when governments pursue policies that are supposed to "strengthen the economy" but which run against public interest.

      personally, gaming laptops hold no appeal to me, but i've seen countless other great products fail because they were the victim of poor marketing. it's sad when marketing/advertising determines the success of a product rather than its technological/practical

  • Whatever happened to that bullshit from AMD where you could run integrated graphics, and switch over to discrete graphics when the need arose.

    I believe they also let you run crossfire across them, though it was immature and you'd get anywhere from a ~10% increase to a ~20% decrease.

    One of the neat things was that the discrete gpu would be nearly dead when not in use, but would automatically come to life when you needed it.

    I guess that all hinged on AMD getting a chipset that was worth a damn to market. Hyb

    • It's out there already, only the Atom is such a compelling CPU that most of the nettops are now using that as a base processor. AMD has a similar proc, but doesn't match the speed, or the light energy use of the Atom.
  • by Lord Byron II (671689) on Friday September 26 2008, @07:31PM (#25173507)
    A surprising number of stories that make it to the front page have a rhetorical, leading question. In this case: "is feature-creep killing this new market already?" The question itself begs the question - is this new netbook a victim of "feature creep"? I know that anyone else who cares about logic in their arguments is bothered as much as I am. I wish that the editors would filter this sort of nonsense out before they post.
    • New Journalism (Score:4, Interesting)

      by copponex (13876) on Friday September 26 2008, @10:17PM (#25174497) Homepage

      Let's say you have an incredibly dumb hypothesis, but you don't want to claim it. Add a question mark, and you can still say the same thing and you can pretend you're still a news organization rather than the National Enquirer.

      "Obama is a Muslim" turns into "Is Obama a Muslim?"
      "Palin Faked Preganancy" turns into "Did Palin Fake Her Pregnancy?"

      As with all asinine journalistic methods, this was mainstreamed by Fox News, and covered hilariously by the Daily Show. It's supposed to hook people with outrageous and patently false statements to boost ratings. Instead of information you get speculation, which is worthless.

      The last safe haven is NPR. Why? Public funding allows journalists to be journalists and not just the lapdogs of marketing departments. This is also why the BBC remains one of the most trusted news organizations in the world.

  • What's with the terrible no contrast image? [mobilecomputermag.co.uk] Who on earth thought of that one?

    Maybe it's a test for people who want to spend all day squinting at a tiny 10 inch laptop screen.

  • I have long wished that there was a way to upgrade the GPU in mobiles. Obviously something like this would be relatively niche, but then again so are gametops. Certainly the professional market would appreciate this. Does anybody if this has ever been attempted before and what the effect was?
  • by Guppy (12314) on Friday September 26 2008, @09:42PM (#25174327)

    I've been considering getting a netbook, and noticed that while most are based around Intel's integrated GMA graphics, there was another unusual exception -- the Raon Everrun Note [umpcportal.com]. Almost every netbook out there is based around Intel's Atom CPU, with occasional Core/Celeron ones.

    This one was unusual in that it is equipped with an AMD Turion64 x2 CPU paired with ATI RS690E graphics. The RS690SE is integrated, but supposedly much faster than Intel's, and comes with dedicated graphics memory (what they call "sideport"). It looks like it should be a pretty good performer for a netbook -- so right now for me it is a tossup between this and the N10.

    • if people are willing to type on the qwerty keyboards on smartphones, then i'm sure a mini-notebook is plenty ergonomically functional.

      you prefer mid-sized notebooks, personally? well of course. that's probably what most people prefer as well. that's why they're the mid-size.

      but it's not inconceivable that someone might need/want something a little bigger or a little smaller than your personal preference.

      personally, i'm looking to get a tablet. i don't do any gaming, but as a graphic designer i need a large

    • by roc97007 (608802) on Friday September 26 2008, @07:27PM (#25173469) Journal

      My daughter has two laptops, an IBM T30 and an Asus EEE. The T30 stays in her room and is used for movies, itunes, homework. The EEE stays in her purse and is used for web, chat, email when she's out of the house, and occasionally to do homework when she wants to work on the kitchen table or upstairs in front of the TV. Before she got the EEE, she tried carrying around the T30, but size, weight and battery life made this a real chore.

      Trying to develop C++ applications or run Halo 3 is not what these netbooks were designed for, and they -- still -- do what they *are* designed for very well. Trying to push them into areas they were not meant to go will -- duh -- give you questionable results. Like Max Payne running on a Surf, it's amazing that it works at all.

      Yes, the keyboard kinda sucks and the screen is small. But the T30 won't fit in a purse, and my Latitude D620 *certainly* won't fit. When you need to look something up or send an email, any computer is better than no computer at all, and your big fancy white-hot dual core monster sitting at home isn't going to be any help when you're sitting here right now. The best computer is the one within reach, and the netbook is more likely to be with you when you're out of the building.

      Moreover, the EEE will keep going long after the others have gone dark. For this reason, I sometimes borrow it for times when I won't be near a power source. (I wish she hadn't picked pink, though.)

      And as cramped as the EEE is, it's still a damned site better than my Treo for web.

      There may be a need for a bigger screen and better keyboard amongst those looking for a portable web appliance, but if it substantially increases the footprint, it breaks the paradigm. Moreover, I suspect that letting the price creep up makes it less attractive for people looking for an additional device, more portable than their mongo laptop but providing a better experience than their cell phone.

    • by ozphx (1061292) on Saturday September 27 2008, @02:57AM (#25175699) Homepage

      Powerful introduction, but a touch weak on the finish. Nice reinforcement of their promiscuity with the copulative verb. This post failed to reach its potential, some homosexual references and threats may have helped here.

      Disappointing. Two stars.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      And no moving parts. This has a mechanical hard disk which, to me, kicks it out of the interesting category. Also, please can we stop saying 'netbook' to describe things that aren't Netbooks [wikipedia.org]